POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas Bill Requires Local Police and Sheriffs to Seek Federal Immigration Enforcement Agreements and Penalizes Noncompliance

Original title: AN ACT concerning law enforcement agencies; relating to enforcement of immigration laws; requiring certain law enforcement agencies to apply for and enter into agreements with United States immigration and customs enforcement; providing a cause of action and penalties for failure to comply.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in Committee

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Local Kansas law enforcement agencies would be required to apply for federal 287(g) agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to enforce federal immigration laws, under a failed Senate bill. Agencies failing to comply or report their status would face lawsuits from the attorney general, court costs, and the loss of state grant funding.

Why it matters

Police departments and county sheriff's offices across Kansas would face mandatory federal immigration enforcement duties, potential legal action in Shawnee County District Court, and the forfeiture of unpaid state and federal grant moneys for noncompliance.

Background
  • Senate Bill 178 was introduced in the 2025-2026 session by the Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs and ultimately died in committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

law enforcement agency

Law enforcement agencies must apply for federal immigration enforcement agreements, report compliance statuses to the attorney general, face potential lawsuits, and risk losing state grant moneys for noncompliance.

Directly affected

attorney general

The attorney general receives compliance notices and judicial orders, sends warning notices, brings causes of action in Shawnee County District Court, and may recover investigatory and legal costs.

Directly affected

state treasurer

The state treasurer receives copies of judicial orders regarding agency noncompliance from the attorney general.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a local police department or sheriff's office is not offered an immigration enforcement agreement by ICE?
The agency must submit written notice and documentation of its proper request and lack of an offer to the attorney general.
What penalties do law enforcement agencies face for failing to comply with the act?
Noncompliant agencies can face lawsuits brought by the attorney general in Shawnee County District Court for , payment of court costs and attorney fees, loss of unpaid state grant moneys, and ineligibility for state grants during the next fiscal year.
Which agencies qualify as a law enforcement agency under this bill?
The bill defines law enforcement agencies to include city police departments, county sheriff's departments, county law enforcement departments established under K.S.A. 19-4401 et seq., consolidated city-county law enforcement agencies, county police departments, and other law enforcement departments of taxing political subdivisions.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026Senate
    Died in Committee
  2. Mar 6, 2025Senate
    Hearing: Thursday, March 6, 2025, 10:30 AM — Room 144-S — CANCELED
  3. Feb 11, 2025Senate
    Hearing: Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 10:30 AM — Room 144-S — CANCELED
  4. Feb 5, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Senate Committee on Federal and State Affairs
  5. Feb 4, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

director of the budget, attorney general, state treasurer and 4 more
Organizationdirector of the budget“Certifies amounts to be lapsed or reduced from expenditure limitations upon rece”Map →
Organizationattorney general“Receives compliance notices, brings causes of action, and distributes judicial o”Map →
Organizationstate treasurer“Receives copies of judicial orders regarding noncompliant law enforcement agenci”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Federal and State Affairs“Sponsor of Senate Bill 178”Map →
Organizationdirector of the legislative research“Receives copies of judicial orders concerning noncompliant agencies”Map →
OrganizationUnited States immigration and customs enforcement“Federal agency designated to enter into agreements with local law enforcement ag”Map →
locationShawnee county“Location of the district court where the attorney general brings actions for non”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record