POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on Reforming the Electoral Count Act

Original title: THE ELECTORAL COUNT ACT: THE NEED FOR REFORM

Record date · January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is the transcript of a Senate Committee on Rules and Administration hearing held on August 3, 2022, to discuss potential reforms to the . The hearing featured testimony from senators, legal scholars, and advocacy groups regarding the need to update the 1887 law governing the of presidential elections.

Why it matters

The hearing addresses proposed changes to the federal law that dictates how Congress counts and certifies electoral votes, which directly impacts the legal framework for future presidential election outcomes.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

United States Congress

Congress is responsible for the final certification of presidential election results under the procedures defined by the Act.

Directly affected

State Election Officials

Changes to the Act may alter the requirements for how states submit their electoral vote certifications to the federal government.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on August 3, 2022, in the Russell Senate Office Building.
  • The primary subject is the reform of the Electoral Count Act (ECA) of 1887.
  • The committee heard testimony from legal experts, including Bob Bauer, John M. Gore, Norman Eisen, Derek T. Muller, and Janai Nelson.
  • Multiple organizations submitted statements for the record, including the R Street Institute, Campaign Legal Center, and the Cato Institute.
Show all 7 facts
  • The hearing included formal opening statements from Senators Klobuchar, Blunt, Collins, Manchin, and King.
  • The committee received written testimony from the New York City Bar Association and Democracy 21.
  • The hearing record includes letters of support for ECA reform from various groups, including the Leadership Now Project and the Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Electoral Count Act?
It is an 1887 federal law that establishes the procedures for how Congress counts and certifies the electoral votes cast by states for the President and Vice President.
Why is Congress considering reform to this act?
The hearing transcript indicates a bipartisan effort to clarify and update the procedures for certifying election results to ensure the process is clear and stable.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Bipartisan Legislative Alignment

The hearing highlights a rare instance of bipartisan collaboration between Senate leadership on the Rules Committee to reform election certification procedures.

Connected Entities

Amy Klobuchar, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Susan Collins and 6 more
PersonAmy Klobuchar“Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration”Map →
OrganizationNAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund“Advocacy group providing testimony”Map →
PersonSusan Collins“United States Senator from Maine”Map →
OrganizationCato Institute“Organization submitting a letter of support”Map →
PersonNorman Eisen“Senior Fellow at The Brookings Institution”Map →
PersonRoy Blunt“Ranking member of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration”Map →
PersonBob Bauer“Professor at NYU School of Law”Map →
PersonAngus S King, Jr.“United States Senator from Maine”Map →
PersonManchin, Joe“United States Senator from West Virginia”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record