POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

House Armed Services Committee: 2020 Defense Budget Member Day Hearing

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 116-25] NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS

January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal mechanism for non-committee members to influence the annual defense budget and policy priorities, which dictate billions in federal spending and military operations for the upcoming fiscal year.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Members of Congress

Non-committee members used this platform to advocate for specific defense-related priorities in their districts or policy areas.

House Committee on Armed Services

The committee members are responsible for incorporating the testimony and submissions into the final draft of the NDAA.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2020.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the transcript from a 'Member Day' hearing held by the House Committee on Armed Services on April 3, 2019. During this session, members of Congress who are not on the committee presented their priorities and recommendations for the for Fiscal Year 2020.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on April 3, 2019, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The purpose of the hearing was to gather input from non-committee members for the Fiscal Year 2020 National Defense Authorization Act.
  • Eight members of Congress provided in-person testimony during the hearing.
  • Ten additional written statements were submitted for the record by other members of Congress.
  • Twenty additional documents were submitted for the record by various representatives.
  • Each testifying member was allotted 4 minutes to present their priorities.
  • The committee chairman, Adam Smith, presided over the hearing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'Member Day' hearing?
It is a hearing where members of Congress who are not on a specific committee are invited to share their priorities and concerns regarding legislation that the committee is currently drafting.
Was any final legislation passed during this hearing?
No. This was a hearing to gather input and testimony; no votes on the final bill were taken during this session.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal mechanism for non-committee members to influence the annual defense budget and policy priorities, which dictate billions in federal spending and military operations for the upcoming fiscal year.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 4 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Broad Congressional Input

The hearing demonstrates a formal effort to include input from 38 different members of Congress beyond the committee membership, indicating a wide range of regional and policy interests influencing the defense budget.

Connected Entities

personMark E. GreenRepresentative from Tennessee who provided testimonyMap →
personEd CaseRepresentative from Hawaii who provided testimonyMap →
personMax RoseRepresentative from New York who provided testimonyMap →
personMark TakanoRepresentative from California who provided testimonyMap →
personGlenn ThompsonRepresentative from Pennsylvania who provided testimonyMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Armed ServicesThe committee responsible for drafting the National Defense Authorization ActMap →
personJoe CunninghamRepresentative from South Carolina who provided testimonyMap →
personAdam SmithChairman of the House Committee on Armed ServicesMap →
personDerek KilmerRepresentative from Washington who provided testimonyMap →
personMichael F.Q. San NicolasDelegate from Guam who provided testimonyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record