POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Rhode Island Bill Prohibits Healthcare Providers from Requiring Stored Electronic Payment Info

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO BUSINESSES AND PROFESSIONS -- PATIENT PAYMENT INFORMATION (Prohibits a healthcare provider from requiring patients to provide electronic payment information to be kept on file as a condition to receiving treatment and makes it a violation a deceptive trade practice.)

Last action · April 2, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Alana DiMario and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Healthcare providers are prohibited from requiring patients to store electronic payment information on file as a condition of receiving treatment, with violations classified as s.

Why it matters

Patients retain the right to receive medical treatment without card-on-file requirements, and providers face legal liability under laws for noncompliance.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

patients

Patients cannot be required to store electronic payment information as a condition of receiving medical treatment.

Directly affected

healthcare providers

Healthcare providers are prohibited from making electronic payment storage a condition for treatment and face legal violations if they do so.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a doctor refuse to treat me if I decline to put my credit card on file?
No. Under this measure, healthcare providers are prohibited from requiring electronic payment information to be kept on file as a condition of receiving treatment.
What happens to a healthcare provider that requires electronic payment information for treatment?
Requiring electronic payment information on file as a condition of treatment is classified as a .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 2, 2026
    Committee recommended measure be held for further study
  2. Mar 27, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (04/02/2026)
  3. Feb 27, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to Senate Health and Human Services

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Tiara Mack, Alana DiMario, Bridget Valverde and 2 more
PersonTiara Mack“Cosponsor of S 2688”Map →
PersonAlana DiMario“Primary sponsor of S 2688”Map →
PersonBridget Valverde“Cosponsor of S 2688”Map →
PersonPam Lauria“Cosponsor of S 2688”Map →
PersonMelissa Murray“Cosponsor of S 2688”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record