POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Election Security and Threats to Officials

Original title: THE CHANGING ELECTION SECURITY LANDSCAPE: THREATS TO ELECTION OFFICIALS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Record date · January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Committee on Homeland Security held a hearing to examine the evolving security landscape for U.S. elections, focusing on threats to election infrastructure and the safety of election workers. Witnesses and committee members discussed the impact of foreign interference, social media, and domestic political rhetoric on the integrity of democratic processes.

Why it matters

This hearing documents the official congressional record regarding the security of election systems and the safety of the personnel who administer them, which informs potential future federal policy and funding for election administration.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Election Officials

These individuals are the primary subjects of the hearing regarding their safety and the security of the infrastructure they manage.

Directly affected

Federal Government

The committee is evaluating the need for federal policy changes or funding to address election security.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on July 20, 2022, in the Cannon House Office Building.
  • The session focused on the changing landscape of election security, specifically threats to infrastructure and election officials.
  • Witnesses included state election officials from New Mexico and Ohio, as well as representatives from the Brennan Center for Justice and the Committee for Safe and Secure Elections.
  • The committee discussed the historical shift in election threats from technical issues like 'hanging chads' to modern concerns regarding foreign interference and domestic harassment.
Show all 5 facts
  • The Vice Chairman noted that previous recommendations from an Election Security Task Force have not been enacted into law.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To examine current threats to election infrastructure and the safety of election officials in the United States.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Maggie Toulouse Oliver (Secretary of State, New Mexico), Neal Kelley (Committee for Safe and Secure Elections), Elizabeth Howard (Brennan Center for Justice), and Frank LaRose (Secretary of State, Ohio).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Evolution of Election Threats

The hearing highlights a shift in focus from technical ballot-counting errors to human-centric threats like harassment of officials and disinformation campaigns.

Connected Entities

Elizabeth Howard, Maggie Toulouse Oliver, Committee on Homeland Security and 3 more
PersonElizabeth Howard“Senior Counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice and hearing witness.”Map →
PersonMaggie Toulouse Oliver“Secretary of State of New Mexico and hearing witness.”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Homeland Security“The House committee conducting the hearing.”Map →
PersonFrank LaRose“Secretary of State of Ohio and hearing witness.”Map →
PersonRitchie Torres“Vice Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security presiding over the hearing.”Map →
PersonNeal Kelley“Chair of the Committee for Safe and Secure Elections and hearing witness.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record