The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.House Rules for Debating Fentanyl Scheduling Bill (H.R. 27)
Last action · February 5, 2025: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsor: H. Griffith
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This resolution sets the rules for how the U.S. House of Representatives will debate and vote on H.R. 27, a bill concerning the legal classification of fentanyl-related substances. It establishes the time limits for debate, allows for specific amendments, and waives standard procedural objections to expedite the process.
This resolution determines the specific legislative path for H.R. 27, dictating how much time lawmakers have to debate the bill and which amendments can be considered before a final vote on federal drug policy.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Committee on Energy and Commerce
The chair and ranking member are tasked with controlling the one hour of debate on the bill.
Members of the House of Representatives
Members are bound by the procedural constraints, including time limits and amendment restrictions, set by this resolution.
Key Facts
- The resolution authorizes the House to consider H.R. 27, a bill to amend the Controlled Substances Act regarding fentanyl-related substances.
- All points of order against the consideration of H.R. 27 are waived.
- The amendment printed in part A of the Rules Committee report is considered automatically adopted upon the resolution's passage.
- The bill is considered as read.
Show all 8 facts
- All points of order against provisions in the amended bill are waived.
- Debate is limited to one hour, equally divided between the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- An additional amendment printed in part B of the report is permitted if offered by the designated member, with separate debate time.
- The resolution allows for one motion to recommit the bill.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this resolution actually do?
Will there be a public debate on the fentanyl bill?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: signed.
Procedural history
11 actions- Feb 5, 2025HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Feb 5, 2025HouseOn agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 215 - 208 (Roll no. 31). (text: CR H469)
- Feb 5, 2025HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 215 - 208 (Roll no. 31). (text: CR H469)
- Feb 5, 2025HouseOn ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 208 (Roll no. 30). (consideration: CR H482)
- Feb 5, 2025HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H482-483)
- Feb 5, 2025HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 93, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Show 5 earlier actions
- Feb 5, 2025HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 93.
- Feb 5, 2025HouseConsidered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H469-478)
- Feb 4, 2025HousePlaced on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 2.
- Feb 4, 2025HouseThe resolution makes in order only the further amendment printed in Part B of the Rules Committee report.
- Feb 4, 2025HouseThe House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-2, by Mr. Griffith.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
423
- Yes
- 215
- No
- 208
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (423)
399 more members
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expedited Legislative Process
The resolution uses multiple procedural tools—waiving points of order and pre-adopting an amendment—to accelerate the passage of H.R. 27.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
