POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofZoning →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Zoning Change Request for Main Street and Flint Avenue

Original title: Application Number: RZ-STD 23-0063 Applicant: KALBANI MERVAT Location: N Side of Main St & Flint Ave Intersection. Folio Number: 60452.0100 Acreage: 1.93 acres, more or less Comprehensive Plan: RES-6 Service Area: Rural Community Plan: Thonotosassa Existing Zoning: CN & RSC-6 Request: Rezone to CG (R) RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Hearing Master: Denial Development Services: Approval Planning Commission: Inconsistent with the Plan

Record date · May 9, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a zoning application (RZ-STD 23-0063) for a 1.93-acre property located at the intersection of Main Street and Flint Avenue in Thonotosassa. The applicant, Mervat Kalbani, requested a rezone from and (Residential Single-Family Conventional) to .

Why it matters

The decision determines the types of commercial or residential activities permitted on this 1.93-acre site, impacting future land use options in the Thonotosassa community.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Mervat Kalbani

The applicant is seeking a change in land use designation for their property.

Directly affected

Thonotosassa residents

Residents in the area are affected by changes to permitted land use and development standards in their community.

Key Facts

  • The application (RZ-STD 23-0063) requested a rezone to CG (Commercial General) for a 1.93-acre site.
  • The property is located on the north side of the Main Street and Flint Avenue intersection.
  • The current zoning for the site is CN (Commercial Neighborhood) and RSC-6 (Residential Single-Family Conventional).
  • The property is designated as RES-6 under the Comprehensive Plan.
Show all 8 facts
  • The property is located within a Rural service area.
  • The Zoning Hearing Master recommended denial of the request.
  • Development Services recommended approval of the request.
  • The Planning Commission determined the request was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current zoning of the property?
The property is currently zoned and (Residential Single-Family Conventional).
What was the recommendation from the Planning Commission?
The Planning Commission found the request to be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Conflicting Administrative Recommendations

The application shows a clear split in administrative opinion, with Development Services supporting the change while the Zoning Hearing Master and Planning Commission opposed it.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record