POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Hearing on the Future of the International Space Station After 2024

Original title: THE ISS AFTER 2024: OPTIONS AND IMPACTS

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House held a hearing to discuss the future of the International Space Station (ISS) beyond 2024. The session explored various options for the station's operation, scientific impact, and the role of U.S. leadership in space exploration.

Why it matters

The decisions regarding the ISS after 2024 will determine the future of U.S.-led orbital research, international space partnerships, and the allocation of federal funding for human space exploration.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

NASA

The agency is responsible for the management and operation of the ISS and must plan for its future status.

Directly affected

Commercial Space Industry

Companies involved in spaceflight are impacted by decisions regarding the transition of orbital research to commercial entities.

Directly affected

Scientific Research Community

Researchers rely on the ISS as a platform for experiments that cannot be conducted on Earth.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 22, 2017, by the Subcommittee on Space.
  • The primary subject was the operational and scientific future of the International Space Station (ISS) after the year 2024.
  • The hearing included testimony from NASA officials, industry representatives, and academic researchers.
  • The ISS is described as an internationally built and operated laboratory for scientific and technological research.
Show all 5 facts
  • The subcommittee examined the impact of potential policy changes on U.S. leadership in space exploration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the year 2024 significant for the International Space Station?
The hearing focused on the status of the ISS after 2024, as current planning and international agreements regarding its operation were approaching that timeframe.
Who provided testimony at this hearing?
Witnesses included William Gerstenmaier (NASA), Dr. Mary Lynne Dittmar (Coalition for Deep Space Exploration), Eric Stallmer (Commercial Spaceflight Federation), and Dr. Robert Ferl (University of Florida).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Transition Planning

The hearing highlights the early stages of federal planning for the transition of the ISS from a government-run facility to potential commercial or alternative models.

Connected Entities

NASA, Eric Stallmer, Ami Bera and 4 more
OrganizationNASA“Primary federal agency overseeing ISS operations”Map →
PersonEric Stallmer“President, Commercial Spaceflight Federation”Map →
PersonAmi Bera“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Space”Map →
PersonWilliam Gerstenmaier“Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, NASA”Map →
PersonMary Lynne Dittmar“Executive Director, Coalition for Deep Space Exploration”Map →
PersonRobert Ferl“Distinguished Professor, University of Florida”Map →
PersonBrian Babin“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Space”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record