Hearing on Electric Grid Resiliency
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing sets the policy framework for how federal agencies and energy providers prioritize investments in grid infrastructure to minimize the duration and impact of power outages caused by natural disasters or cyberattacks.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Electric utility companies
These entities are responsible for implementing infrastructure changes and operational protocols to meet resiliency standards.
Federal agencies (DOE)
These agencies oversee research, development, and policy implementation regarding national energy infrastructure.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Why It Matters
This hearing sets the policy framework for how federal agencies and energy providers prioritize investments in grid infrastructure to minimize the duration and impact of power outages caused by natural disasters or cyberattacks.
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on October 3, 2017, to address the resiliency of the U.S. electric grid.
- The committee reviewed recommendations from a July 2017 National Academies of Sciences report.
- Resiliency is defined by the committee as the ability to prevent power disruptions, limit their duration, and repair damage quickly.
- The committee identified physical threats, cyber threats, and natural disasters (such as Hurricane Harvey) as primary risks to the grid.
- The hearing included testimony from experts in electrical engineering, energy policy, and public power associations.
- The committee emphasized that grid damage is inevitable, shifting the focus from threat prevention to system recovery and durability.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'grid resiliency' mean?
Why is the government focusing on this?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift from Prevention to Resiliency
The committee explicitly signaled a policy pivot away from solely trying to prevent threats toward accepting that damage is inevitable and prioritizing rapid recovery.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy15Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools