POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed 2014 Budget for Customs and Border Protection

Original title: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014

Record date · January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) provided testimony regarding the fiscal year 2014 budget for Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The union advocates for hiring 3,477 new officers, increasing to cover operational costs, and maintaining funding for foreign language incentive programs.

Why it matters

The proposal impacts the speed of international trade and travel at U.S. ports of entry by adjusting staffing levels and increasing for passengers and commercial carriers.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

CBP Officers

The proposal impacts their staffing levels, overtime funding, and eligibility for foreign language incentive awards.

Directly affected

International Travelers and Commercial Carriers

They would be subject to a $2 increase in immigration and customs user fees.

Key Facts

  • The NTEU supports hiring 3,477 new CBP officers for air, sea, and land ports of entry.
  • 1,600 new officer positions would be funded by a $210.1 million increase in the federal budget.
  • 1,877 new officer positions would be funded by a $2 increase in immigration and customs user fees.
  • Customs user fees have not been increased since 2001.
Show all 10 facts
  • The NTEU opposes a proposed $16 million cut to the Foreign Language Award Program (FLAP).
  • FLAP provides cash awards to employees proficient in critical foreign languages like Urdu, Farsi, and Arabic.
  • The budget proposes cutting 21 trade operations positions, including 14 rulings and regulations staff.
  • CBP reported a $100 million shortfall in commercial vehicle user fees in 2010.
  • Agriculture Quality Inspection (AQI) user fees currently cover only 62 percent of inspection costs, leaving a $325 million gap.
  • The NTEU supports a study of land border fee options to ensure full cost recovery for inspection services.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does the union want to increase user fees?
The union argues that current fees have not been updated since 2001 and do not cover the actual costs of processing passengers and commercial shipments, leading to staffing shortages and delays.
What is the Foreign Language Award Program?
It is a program that provides cash incentives to CBP officers who use foreign language skills on the job, which the union argues is critical for anti-terrorism and efficient processing.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Stagnant User Fees

The document highlights that customs user fees have remained unchanged since 2001, creating a significant funding gap for inspection services.

Connected Entities

National Treasury Employees Union, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Mary Landrieu and 2 more
OrganizationNational Treasury Employees Union“The union representing 24,000 CBP officers and trade specialists.”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Customs and Border Protection“The federal agency responsible for border security and trade regulation.”Map →
PersonMary Landrieu“Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Appropriations.”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Accountability Office“Federal agency that provided reports on fee revenue and program costs.”Map →
PersonDan Coats“Ranking Member of the Senate Subcommittee on Appropriations.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record