The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Rhode Island Bill Extends Retired Municipal Employee Work Limits to 90 Days Without Pension Interruption
Last action · February 12, 2026: Introduced, referred to House FinanceSponsors: Paul Santucci and 7 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Retired municipal employees are allowed to work up to 90 days or 630 hours per calendar year without losing their under a new legislative proposal introduced in the Rhode Island House.
The change affects how many hours retirees can supplement their income through public sector work without triggering a suspension of their retirement benefits.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Retired municipal employees
Retired municipal employees are permitted to work up to 90 days or 630 hours per calendar year without having their pension benefits interrupted.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many days can a retired municipal employee work under this measure?
Is there an hourly equivalent for the work limit?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Feb 12, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, referred to House Finance
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
status.rilegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
