POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Rhode Island Bill Extends Retired Municipal Employee Work Limits to 90 Days Without Pension Interruption

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO TOWNS AND CITIES -- RETIREMENT OF MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES (Increases the number of days a retired municipal employee could work in a calendar year without interruption of pension benefits to ninety (90) days or its equivalent of six hundred thirty (630) hours.)

Last action · February 12, 2026: Introduced, referred to House FinanceSponsors: Paul Santucci and 7 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Retired municipal employees are allowed to work up to 90 days or 630 hours per calendar year without losing their under a new legislative proposal introduced in the Rhode Island House.

Why it matters

The change affects how many hours retirees can supplement their income through public sector work without triggering a suspension of their retirement benefits.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Retired municipal employees

Retired municipal employees are permitted to work up to 90 days or 630 hours per calendar year without having their pension benefits interrupted.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many days can a retired municipal employee work under this measure?
A retired municipal employee can work up to 90 days in a calendar year without .
Is there an hourly equivalent for the work limit?
Yes, the equivalent limit is 630 hours in a calendar year.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 12, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to House Finance

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

George Nardone, David Place, Marie Hopkins and 6 more
PersonGeorge Nardone“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonDavid Place“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMarie Hopkins“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonDick Fascia“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMike Chippendale“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonPaul Santucci“Primary sponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonChris Paplauskas“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationHouse Finance“Committee to which the bill was referred”Map →
PersonSherry Roberts“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record