POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Mississippi Senate Bill 2376 restores legal assistant positions in the Fourteenth Circuit Court District

Original title: Legal assistants; restore the assistant removed from the Fourteenth Circuit Court District.

Last action · February 3, 2026: 02/03 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Jason Barrett

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 2376 amends state law to restore legal assistant staffing levels in the Fourteenth and adjusts authorized assistant counts across multiple other circuit court districts statewide effective July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Alters staffing allocations and funding mechanisms for district attorney offices across Mississippi's s, affecting local county budgets and the administrative capacity of prosecutors.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Fourteenth Circuit Court District

The authorized number of full-time legal assistants for the district is restored to six.

Directly affected

District Attorneys

District attorneys gain explicit authorization to assign duties to legal assistants regardless of funding source and to employ additional staff using external funding streams.

Directly affected

Boards of Supervisors

County boards may adopt resolutions to fund salaries, supplemental pay, and fringe benefits for legal assistants in their districts.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How can a district attorney hire additional legal assistants beyond state limits?
A district attorney may employ additional legal assistants or criminal investigators using funds from office-generated revenues, counties, municipalities, federal funds, private grants, or s.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    02/03 (S) Died In Committee
  2. Jan 19, 2026SenateCommittee
    01/19 (S) Referred To Judiciary, Division A

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Legislative Budget Office, Twenty-third Circuit Court District, Eighteenth Circuit Court District and 5 more
OrganizationLegislative Budget Office“Receives information regarding supplemental salaries and expenses from the Depar”Map →
locationTwenty-third Circuit Court District“District paragraph scheduled to stand repealed effective January 1, 2027”Map →
locationEighteenth Circuit Court District“District scheduled to have four legal assistants effective January 1, 2027”Map →
locationNinth Circuit Court District“District scheduled to have four legal assistants effective January 1, 2027”Map →
locationTwenty-first Circuit Court District“District scheduled to have eight legal assistants effective January 1, 2027”Map →
locationTwentieth Circuit Court District“District scheduled to have ten legal assistants effective January 1, 2027”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Finance and Administration“Receives transferred supplemental funds and reporting data from district attorne”Map →
locationFourteenth Circuit Court District“Circuit court district affected by the legal assistant staffing change”Map →

Sources

Open source document

billstatus.ls.state.ms.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record