POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Senate Hearing on Data Security and Privacy Standards

Original title: ENHANCING DATA SECURITY

Record date · January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on October 6, 2021, to discuss federal standards for data security and privacy. The session focused on addressing the rising frequency of data breaches and the need for enhanced protections for American consumers.

Why it matters

This hearing serves as a legislative foundation for potential future federal regulations that could mandate how companies store and protect consumer data, directly impacting the security protocols businesses must implement and the privacy rights of individuals.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

American consumers

Individuals whose personal data is subject to security breaches and potential future federal privacy protections.

Directly affected

Federal Trade Commission

The agency is being considered for expanded resources and a new internal bureau to manage data privacy.

Directly affected

Technology companies

Businesses may be subject to new federal data security standards and compliance requirements.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on October 6, 2021, in the Russell Senate Office Building.
  • This was the second in a series of hearings regarding federal standards for privacy and data security.
  • The committee discussed providing the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with new resources and establishing a Data Privacy Bureau.
  • The hearing addressed the increasing rate of data breaches affecting hundreds of millions of American consumers.
Show all 7 facts
  • Four expert witnesses provided testimony and prepared statements regarding data security.
  • The committee members engaged in a question-and-answer session with witnesses following opening statements.
  • The appendix includes responses to written follow-up questions submitted by various Senators to the witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine data security vulnerabilities and discuss the need for federal standards to protect consumer privacy.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included James E. Lee (Identity Theft Resource Center), Jessica L. Rich (Kelley Drye & Warren), Edward W. Felten (Princeton University), and Kate Tummarello (Engine).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on FTC Expansion

The hearing highlights a clear legislative intent to empower the FTC with a dedicated Data Privacy Bureau, signaling a shift toward more centralized federal oversight of data security.

Connected Entities

Maria Cantwell, Kate Tummarello, Jessica L. Rich and 4 more
PersonMaria Cantwell“Chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”Map →
PersonKate Tummarello“Executive Director, Engine”Map →
PersonJessica L. Rich“Of Counsel, Kelley Drye & Warren”Map →
PersonRoger Wicker“Ranking Member of the Committee”Map →
OrganizationFederal Trade Commission“Primary federal agency discussed regarding data privacy enforcement”Map →
PersonEdward W. Felten“Professor at Princeton University and former FTC Chief Technologist”Map →
PersonJames E. Lee“Chief Operating Officer, Identity Theft Resource Center”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record