The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Correction to Senate Hearing Record on Opioid Misuse
Record date · January 1, 2022
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This document is an official correction () for a 2016 Senate Special Committee on Aging hearing regarding opioid misuse among older Americans. It corrects a clerical error regarding the staff leadership listed in the original hearing transcript.
This document updates the official record to correctly identify the for the Special Committee on Aging during the 114th Congress.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Mark B. LeDuc
His professional title as Majority Staff Director is correctly attributed in the official record.
Priscilla Hanley
Her name is removed from the list of committee staff in the official record.
Key Facts
- The document serves as an official errata for Senate Hearing 114-852.
- The hearing was titled 'Fighting Against a Growing Epidemic: Opioid Misuse and Abuse Among Older Americans'.
- The hearing took place on February 1, 2016, in Leesburg, Virginia.
- Priscilla Hanley was incorrectly listed as the Majority Staff Director for the Special Committee on Aging in the original transcript.
Show all 5 facts
- Mark B. LeDuc is the correct individual who served as the Majority Staff Director for the Special Committee on Aging during this session.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an errata?
Does this change the content of the hearing on opioid misuse?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Delayed Correction
The errata for a 2016 hearing was published in 2022, indicating a significant delay in updating the official record.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance5How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy0Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment0Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz0Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
