POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Indiana bill requires warning labels on food products containing specified additives and ingredients

Original title: Food labeling requirements.

Last action · January 8, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Public HealthSponsors: Jennifer Meltzer and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Food manufacturers offering certain food products for sale in Indiana must include a specific warning label disclosing the presence of designated ingredients, such as certain food dyes, oils, and chemical additives, starting in mid-2027. The legislation authorizes the attorney general to bring legal actions seeking and civil penalties of up to $50,000 per day for violations, while prohibiting private citizens from filing lawsuits under the chapter.

Why it matters

Food manufacturers and online retailers distributing packaged goods in Indiana face new packaging and website disclosure compliance costs, backed by state-enforced financial penalties reaching $50,000 per daily violation.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

food manufacturer

Food manufacturers must ensure that applicable food products and websites include specific warning labels regarding designated ingredients or face civil penalties.

Directly affected

retailer

Retailers offering covered food products for sale on websites in Indiana must disclose the required labeling information online.

Directly affected

attorney general

The attorney general is authorized to bring legal actions, seek injunctive relief, collect investigation costs, and pursue civil penalties of up to $50,000 per day for violations.

Key Facts

  • Applies to food product labels printed or copyrighted after June 30, 2027.
  • Exempts products not intended for human consumption, items sold in food and retail establishments, federal USDA-inspected items, products with a Surgeon General warning, drugs, dietary supplements, and raw agricultural commodities.
  • Requires a warning label stating that the product contains an ingredient not recommended for human consumption by appropriate authorities in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.
  • Mandates that warning labels use a font size no smaller than the smallest consumer information font required by the FDA and maintain sufficiently high contrast.
Show all 7 facts
  • Requires website disclosures for food products offered for sale online by manufacturers or retailers in Indiana.
  • Authorizes the attorney general to seek injunctive relief, civil penalties up to $50,000 per day per violation, and investigation costs.
  • Explicitly prohibits private individuals from bringing a private cause of action for violations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which food products are exempt from the warning label requirement?
Exempt products include items containing ingredients not intended for human consumption, food sold in food or retail establishments, items regulated by the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service, products carrying a Surgeon General warning, drugs, dietary supplements, and raw agricultural commodities like pesticides and soil.
What text must the warning label contain?
The label must state: 'WARNING: This product contains an ingredient that is not recommended for human consumption by the appropriate authority in Australia, Canada, the European Union, or the United Kingdom.'
Can individual citizens sue food manufacturers for violating these labeling rules?
No, a violation of this chapter does not create a ; enforcement is handled by the attorney general.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Jan 8, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First reading: referred to Committee on Public Health
  2. Jan 8, 2026House
    Coauthored by Representatives McGuire, Barrett, King
  3. Jan 8, 2026House
    Authored by Representative Meltzer

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jennifer Meltzer, Surgeon General of the federal Public Health Service, Julie McGuire and 4 more
PersonJennifer Meltzer“Representative who introduced House Bill No. 1364”Map →
PersonSurgeon General of the federal Public Health Service“Office whose product warning labels exempt products from this bill's requirement”Map →
PersonJulie McGuire“Cosponsor of House Bill No. 1364”Map →
PersonBrad Barrett“Cosponsor of House Bill No. 1364”Map →
PersonJoanna King“Cosponsor of House Bill No. 1364”Map →
OrganizationFood and Drug Administration“Federal agency referenced for ingredient disclosure and font size requirements”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service“Federal agency whose regulated products are exempt from the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record