POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofEnergy →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Louisiana House Bill 499 Sets Minimum Per-Acre Compensation for Nonconsenting Carbon Dioxide Storage Owners

Original title: ENERGY: Provides relative to compensation for pore space owners (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF RV)

Last action · March 9, 2026: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.Sponsors: Danny McCormick and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Louisiana House Bill 499 establishes a minimum per-acre compensation rate for landowners who do not consent to inclusion in a carbon dioxide storage unit, ensuring they receive at least the average per-acre payment of consenting owners. The measure also authorizes reviewing courts to request necessary information to determine just compensation and allows for jury trials in such disputes.

Why it matters

Landowners whose property is designated for carbon dioxide storage without their consent are guaranteed a payment floor equal to the unit's average per-acre rate, altering the financial terms of compulsory geologic storage utilization.

Background
  • Carbon dioxide sequestration units involve injecting captured carbon dioxide into deep underground geologic formations for permanent storage, requiring the integration or unitization of subsurface pore spaces. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

nonconsenting owners in interest

Nonconsenting landowners are guaranteed a minimum per-acre compensation rate equal to the unit average and gain explicit statutory authorization for court review and jury trials regarding compensation.

Directly affected

storage operators

Storage operators must comply with minimum per-acre compensation floors for nonconsenting tract owners and may be subject to court proceedings and jury trials regarding just compensation.

Key Facts

  • Nonconsenting owners in a carbon dioxide storage unit must be paid a per-acre compensation amount that is at least equal to the average per-acre compensation paid to all other owners in the unit.
  • Unit operation orders must provide for just and equitable sharing of benefits and compensation to all owners in interest, including consenting and nonconsenting owners, without altering private contract terms.
  • The commissioner may consider computational modeling, tract impacts, surface acreage share, operational costs, and third-party project viability when determining benefit sharing.
  • Proposed storage unit operators or nonconsenting owners may petition a court to review whether the storage unit purpose is public and necessary and whether compensation is just.
Show all 7 facts
  • Court review of just compensation is limited to the specific owner in interest seeking review and may be heard through a jury trial if requested.
  • Review proceedings regarding compensation shall be tried by preference and conducted with the greatest possible dispatch.
  • Courts are authorized to request all information necessary to determine just compensation for an owner in interest.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the minimum compensation a nonconsenting landowner can receive for carbon dioxide storage?
A cannot be compensated with an amount per acre that is less than the average compensation paid per acre to all other owners in interest in the storage unit.
Can a court review the compensation offered to a landowner?
Yes, a proposed storage unit operator or any owner who has not entered an agreement can request a court to review whether the compensation provided is just and whether the storage unit purpose is public and necessary.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.
  2. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  3. Feb 26, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  4. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Compensation Minimums

The bill introduces a statutory payment floor for nonconsenting property owners based on the average per-acre payout within the geologic storage unit.

Connected Entities

Rodney Schamerhorn, Committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Charles Owen and 1 more
PersonRodney Schamerhorn“Co-sponsor of House Bill 499”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Natural Resources and Environment“House committee where the bill was referred”Map →
PersonCharles Owen“Co-sponsor of House Bill 499”Map →
PersonDanny McCormick“Representative who introduced House Bill 499”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record