POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCrimes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

South Dakota excludes firearm silencers from the definition of controlled weapons

Original title: provide that a firearm silencer is not a controlled weapon.

Last action · February 11, 2026: Signed by the GovernorSponsors: Casey Crabtree and 60 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

South Dakota law has been amended to remove firearm silencers from the legal definition of a "," altering how state weapons laws apply to these devices.

Why it matters

Changes the legal status of firearm silencers under state criminal statutes, ensuring that possessing a silencer is no longer automatically classified as possessing a under SDCL 22-14-6.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Firearm owners

Firearm owners possessing or acquiring silencers no longer have those items classified as controlled weapons under state law.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Enforcement standards and statutory definitions regarding weapon possession charges are modified by removing silencers from the controlled weapon category.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are firearm silencers still considered controlled weapons in South Dakota?
No. Senate Bill 2 explicitly amends the state's legal definitions to exclude firearm silencers from the definition of a "."
What weapons are still classified as controlled weapons under the law?
Machine guns and short shotguns remain classified as s under SDCL 22-1-2.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. Feb 11, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor
  2. Feb 5, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Delivered to the Governor
  3. Feb 4, 2026House
    Signed by the Speaker
  4. Feb 4, 2026Senate
    Signed by the President
  5. Jan 29, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  6. Jan 28, 2026HouseCommittee
    Do Pass
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Jan 28, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  2. Jan 26, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First read in House and referred to
  3. Jan 23, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass Amended
  4. Jan 23, 2026Senate
    Motion to amend
  5. Jan 22, 2026SenateCommittee
    Do Pass
  6. Jan 22, 2026Senate
    Scheduled for hearing
  7. Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First read in Senate and referred to

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse1/29/2026South Dakota LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Do Pass Amended

Total

70

Yes
66
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0
Other positions
4

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 56 more sponsors

Connected Entities

Drew Peterson, Casey Crabtree, South Dakota National Guard
PersonDrew Peterson“State Senator sponsoring Senate Bill 2”Map →
PersonCasey Crabtree“State Senator sponsoring Senate Bill 2”Map →
OrganizationSouth Dakota National Guard“Exempted military group under controlled weapon statutes”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record