POLISCOPE
Back to feed
HR3505FEDERALin_committee

Barriers to Suicide Act of 2025

May 20, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.May 20, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

The bill authorizes $10 million annually from 2026 through 2030 for state and local governments to install suicide deterrents on public infrastructure, with the federal government covering up to 80% of project costs.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

State and local governments

These entities are eligible to apply for federal grants to install suicide deterrents on local infrastructure.

Department of Transportation

The agency is required to establish and administer the new grant program and determine eligibility criteria.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill directs the U.S. Department of Transportation to create a grant program for installing suicide prevention nets and barriers on bridges, buildings, parking garages, and rail infrastructure. It also mandates a federal study to identify effective suicide deterrents for structures other than bridges.

Key Facts

  • Authorizes $10 million in annual appropriations for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
  • Limits the federal share of project costs to a maximum of 80%.
  • Requires the Secretary of Transportation to establish the grant program within one year of enactment.
  • Defines 'covered locations' as bridges, buildings, parking garages, highway-rail grade crossings, and rail stations.
  • Prioritizes grant funding for areas with high suicide rates or per capita suicide statistics.
  • Amends Title 23 of the U.S. Code to explicitly include safety barriers and nets on National Highway System bridges as eligible projects.
  • Mandates a study by the Comptroller General on suicide deterrents for structures other than bridges.
  • Requires the Comptroller General to report study findings to four specific Congressional committees within one year of enactment.
  • Defines 'evidence-based suicide deterrent' as a method supported by high-quality research or positive evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can apply for these grants?
States, s of states, and other entities determined eligible by the Secretary of Transportation.
What types of infrastructure are eligible for these deterrents?
Bridges, buildings, parking garages, highway-rail grade crossings, and rail stations.
Does the federal government pay for the entire project?
No, the federal share is capped at 80% of the total project cost.

Why It Matters

The bill authorizes $10 million annually from 2026 through 2030 for state and local governments to install suicide deterrents on public infrastructure, with the federal government covering up to 80% of project costs.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Expansion of Infrastructure Safety

The bill explicitly expands the definition of eligible National Highway System projects to include suicide deterrents, signaling a shift toward integrating mental health safety into standard transportation infrastructure planning.

Connected Entities

personComptroller General of the United StatesTasked with conducting a study on suicide prevention effectiveness for non-bridgMap →
personMr. BeyerPrimary sponsor of the bill.Map →
organizationDepartment of TransportationThe agency responsible for establishing the grant program.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record