POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofenergy
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on 2017-2022 Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing Plan

Original title: THE BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT'S 2017-2022 OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OIL AND GAS LEASING PROGRAM

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing reviews the federal government's long-term strategy for managing oil and gas exploration on the Outer Continental Shelf, which dictates where and when energy companies can bid for drilling rights on federal submerged lands.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

The agency is responsible for drafting and implementing the five-year leasing program.

Energy Industry

Companies involved in offshore drilling are subject to the leasing schedule and regulations determined by the program.

Coastal Communities

Local governments and residents in coastal areas may experience economic and environmental impacts from offshore leasing activities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held a hearing to conduct on the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's proposed five-year program for oil and gas leasing on the Outer Continental Shelf. The session included testimony from government officials, academic experts, and industry and environmental representatives regarding the 2017-2022 leasing schedule.

Key Facts

  • The hearing focused on the 2017-2022 Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil and gas leasing program.
  • The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is the agency responsible for preparing the five-year leasing schedule.
  • The hearing took place on May 19, 2016, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the Department of the Interior, local government, academia, and environmental advocacy groups.
  • The committee received written testimony and responses to questions for the record from all six primary witnesses.
  • The record includes supplemental materials such as resolutions from the Native Village of Pt. Lay and statements from the Atlantic Energy Alliance and the International Association of Drilling Contractors.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) leasing program?
It is a five-year plan developed by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management that determines the schedule and locations for oil and gas lease sales on federal submerged lands.
What was the purpose of this specific hearing?
The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held the hearing to conduct and gather testimony regarding the proposed 2017-2022 leasing program.

Why It Matters

This hearing reviews the federal government's long-term strategy for managing oil and gas exploration on the Outer Continental Shelf, which dictates where and when energy companies can bid for drilling rights on federal submerged lands.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Broad Stakeholder Engagement

The hearing record includes input from a diverse range of stakeholders, including local Alaskan native villages, academic institutions, and national environmental organizations.

Connected Entities

personLisa MurkowskiChairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural ResourcesMap →
personJohn Hopson, Jr.Mayor of the City of Wainwright, AlaskaMap →
personAbigail Ross HopperDirector of the Bureau of Ocean Energy ManagementMap →
organizationSierra ClubRepresented by Athan Manuel at the hearingMap →
organizationBureau of Ocean Energy ManagementThe federal agency responsible for managing the 2017-2022 leasing programMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record