POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Montana SB 108 Requires Voter Approval for Property Tax Levies and Bonds Funding Certain Judgments, Settlements, and Tax Protests

Original title: Require levies or bonds for judgments, settlements, or protested taxes to be submitted to voters

Last action · May 23, 2025: (H) Died in CommitteeSponsor: Greg Hertz

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill requires local governments, counties, and school districts to submit property tax levies or bond issuances exceeding specified statutory limits to voters when used to satisfy legal judgments, settlements, or property taxes paid under protest. Introduced by Senator Greg Hertz for the 2025 legislative session, the measure applies to property tax levies imposed or bonds issued on or after the effective date of the act.

Why it matters

Local taxpayers gain direct voting power over municipal and school district debt and property tax increases that exceed statutory thresholds for settling lawsuits or refunding protested taxes.

Background
  • Property tax caps and taxpayer relief mechanisms are recurring subjects of legislation in Montana, particularly regarding local government debt and liability management. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Registered Electors

Registered voters gain the authority to approve or reject property tax levies and bond issuances exceeding statutory limits for judgments, settlements, and tax protests.

Directly affected

Counties and Municipalities

Local governing bodies must submit property tax levies or bond issuances exceeding statutory limits for legal judgments or tax protests to an election.

Directly affected

School Districts

School district trustees must submit bond issuances and certain obligations exceeding statutory limits for judgments and tax protests to district electors.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When is voter approval required for property tax levies related to judgments?
Voter approval is required when a property tax levy is imposed to satisfy a final judgment, settlement, or tax protest refund that exceeds the limits provided in section 2-9-108.
What happens to property taxes paid under protest while a lawsuit is pending?
Property taxes paid under protest to a county or municipality must be deposited into a special and retained there until the final determination of any action or suit to recover the taxes.
Are school districts subject to these voter approval rules for bonds?
Yes, bonds issued by school districts for the purpose of satisfying final judgments, settlements, or property taxes paid under protest in excess of statutory limits must be submitted to the registered electors of the school district.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

24 actions
  1. May 23, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Died in Committee
  2. Feb 19, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Tabled in Committee
  3. Feb 11, 2025House
    (H) 1st Reading
  4. Feb 11, 2025House
    (H) Hearing
  5. Feb 11, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Referred to Committee
  6. Feb 10, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to House
Show 18 earlier actions
  1. Feb 10, 2025Senate
    (S) 3rd Reading
  2. Feb 10, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  3. Feb 7, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading
  4. Feb 7, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  5. Feb 4, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Report
  6. Feb 3, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Executive Action
  7. Jan 16, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  8. Jan 14, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  9. Jan 8, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  10. Jan 8, 2025SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  11. Jan 8, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  12. Dec 20, 2024House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  13. Dec 11, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  14. Dec 11, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  15. Dec 10, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  16. Dec 3, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  17. Nov 27, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  18. Nov 11, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Voter Oversight on Local Liabilities

The legislation systematically amends multiple statutory chapters governing counties, municipalities, and school districts to restrict unvoted debt issuance and tax levies for legal judgments and tax protests.

Connected Entities

Montana tax appeal board, Department of Revenue, Greg Hertz
OrganizationMontana tax appeal board“Board involved in property tax appeals and installment determinations”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Revenue“State department responsible for property tax assessments, determinations, and r”Map →
PersonGreg Hertz“Senator who introduced Senate Bill 108”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record