The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Senate Hearing on Natural Hazard Preparedness and Monitoring
Record date · January 1, 2020
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
This Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources hearing examined how the U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Forest Service prepare for and respond to natural disasters like earthquakes, tsunamis, and landslides. The session included testimony from federal officials and state experts, with a specific focus on the recent 7.9 magnitude earthquake near Kodiak, Alaska.
The hearing evaluates the effectiveness of federal and state monitoring systems that provide early warnings for natural disasters, which directly impacts public safety and emergency response capabilities for residents in high-risk areas.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Residents of high-risk seismic zones
These individuals rely on the accuracy and speed of the monitoring and warning systems discussed in the hearing for emergency alerts.
U.S. Geological Survey
The agency's operational procedures and funding priorities for hazard monitoring were subject to congressional oversight.
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on January 30, 2018, by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- The primary focus was the role of the USGS and Forest Service in managing natural hazards including volcanoes, earthquakes, landslides, tsunamis, and avalanches.
- A 7.9 magnitude earthquake occurred off the coast of Kodiak, Alaska, on January 22, 2018.
- The hearing addressed the status of national mapping and monitoring systems used to detect and warn the public about seismic and geological events.
Show all 6 facts
- The committee conducted a business meeting to report four nominations and ratify subcommittee assignments for Senators Capito and Smith.
- Witnesses included representatives from the USGS, U.S. Forest Service, the City of Kodiak, the Washington Geological Survey, the Alaska Earthquake Center, and the Colorado Geological Survey.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Did the committee take any official actions during this meeting?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Reactive Policy Oversight
The hearing was scheduled shortly after a major seismic event in Alaska, demonstrating how specific natural disasters trigger congressional oversight of monitoring agencies.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools