Congressional Hearing: NASA's Past, Present, and Future
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony used by Congress to shape future NASA funding, mission priorities, and space exploration policy.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
NASA
The agency's strategic direction and policy framework are subject to the oversight and legislative priorities discussed by the committee.
Aerospace Industry
Private sector contractors and partners are influenced by the long-term mission goals and funding levels discussed by the committee.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on February 16, 2017, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The session was titled 'NASA: Past, Present, and Future'.
- Four witnesses provided oral and written testimony: Harrison Schmitt, Thomas P. Stafford, Ellen Stofan, and Tom Young.
- The committee received additional materials for the record from Representatives Neal P. Dunn and Gary Palmer.
- The hearing included a formal question-and-answer session with the witnesses.
- Post-hearing responses were submitted by all four witnesses and included in the official record.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony used by Congress to shape future NASA funding, mission priorities, and space exploration policy.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expert Witness Composition
The committee selected a panel consisting entirely of former high-level NASA officials and astronauts, emphasizing institutional memory over current agency leadership.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools