POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on Financial Market Regulation and Capital Formation

Original title: LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO ENHANCE CAPITAL FORMATION, TRANSPARENCY, AND REGULATORY ACCOUNTABILITY

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing served as a formal record of expert testimony and stakeholder positions regarding potential changes to federal financial regulations that govern corporate transparency and investment practices.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Financial Industry Associations

These groups provided testimony and written statements regarding how proposed regulatory changes would impact corporate governance and capital market operations.

Public Interest and Reform Groups

Organizations like Americans for Financial Reform submitted statements regarding the impact of regulatory proposals on market transparency and accountability.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript record of a May 17, 2016, U.S. House subcommittee hearing. Lawmakers and expert witnesses discussed legislative proposals aimed at changing how capital markets are regulated and how corporations report information to the public.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on May 17, 2016, before the Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises.
  • The hearing focused on legislative proposals intended to enhance capital formation, transparency, and regulatory accountability.
  • Five expert witnesses provided testimony, including representatives from the Center on Executive Compensation, Blue Wolf Capital Partners, Patomak Global Partners, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Vermont Law School.
  • The record includes extensive written statements and supplemental materials from various industry groups, including the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, Nasdaq, and Americans for Financial Reform.
  • The hearing is documented as Serial No. 114-88 of the 114th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review and discuss legislative proposals aimed at improving , increasing transparency, and ensuring in financial markets.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included Timothy J. Bartl (Center on Executive Compensation), Joshua Cherry-Seto (Blue Wolf Capital Partners), Daniel M. Gallagher (Patomak Global Partners), Thomas Quaadman (U.S. Chamber of Commerce), and Jennifer Taub (Vermont Law School).

Why It Matters

The hearing served as a formal record of expert testimony and stakeholder positions regarding potential changes to federal financial regulations that govern corporate transparency and investment practices.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Extensive Stakeholder Participation

The hearing record includes a high volume of supplemental statements from diverse industry and advocacy groups, indicating significant interest in the proposed regulatory changes.

Connected Entities

personCarolyn B. MaloneyRanking Member of the Subcommittee.Map →
organizationSubcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored EnterprisesThe House subcommittee that held the hearing.Map →
personTimothy J. BartlWitness, CEO of Center on Executive Compensation.Map →
personScott GarrettChairman of the Subcommittee.Map →
personThomas QuaadmanWitness, U.S. Chamber of Commerce.Map →
personJennifer TaubWitness, Professor of Law at Vermont Law School.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record