Hearing on Financial Market Regulation and Capital Formation
January 1, 2018
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing served as a formal record of expert testimony and stakeholder positions regarding potential changes to federal financial regulations that govern corporate transparency and investment practices.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Financial Industry Associations
These groups provided testimony and written statements regarding how proposed regulatory changes would impact corporate governance and capital market operations.
Public Interest and Reform Groups
Organizations like Americans for Financial Reform submitted statements regarding the impact of regulatory proposals on market transparency and accountability.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on May 17, 2016, before the Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises.
- The hearing focused on legislative proposals intended to enhance capital formation, transparency, and regulatory accountability.
- Five expert witnesses provided testimony, including representatives from the Center on Executive Compensation, Blue Wolf Capital Partners, Patomak Global Partners, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Vermont Law School.
- The record includes extensive written statements and supplemental materials from various industry groups, including the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, Nasdaq, and Americans for Financial Reform.
- The hearing is documented as Serial No. 114-88 of the 114th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at this hearing?
Why It Matters
The hearing served as a formal record of expert testimony and stakeholder positions regarding potential changes to federal financial regulations that govern corporate transparency and investment practices.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Extensive Stakeholder Participation
The hearing record includes a high volume of supplemental statements from diverse industry and advocacy groups, indicating significant interest in the proposed regulatory changes.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools