POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut bill SB 253 repeals statutory limits on residential tenant security deposits

Original title: AN ACT REPEALING SECURITY DEPOSIT MAXIMUMS.

Last action · February 20, 2026: Public Hearing 02/24Sponsor: Rob Sampson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

The General Assembly introduced Raised Bill No. 253, which repeals the existing statutory caps that limit residential landlords to demanding security deposits of no more than one or two months' rent depending on the tenant's age, effective October 1, 2026. The measure makes related technical and conforming changes across various statutes concerning s, state assistance program agreements, small claims court jurisdiction, and bank community reinvestment evaluations.

Why it matters

Removes state-mandated limits on the maximum upfront cash a landlord can request from a residential tenant, altering the financial requirements for securing a lease starting October 1, 2026.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

residential landlords

Directly affected

residential tenants

Tenants face the removal of statutory caps previously limiting security deposits to one or two months' rent.

Directly affected

Banking Commissioner

The commissioner's jurisdiction and oversight duties regarding security deposit complaints and bank community reinvestment evaluations are modified.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Senate Bill 253 change about security deposits?
The bill repeals the current statutory maximum limits that cap security deposits at one or two months' rent.
Do landlords still have to place security deposits in escrow accounts?
Yes, landlords are still required to deposit security deposits into s maintained in financial institutions for the benefit of each tenant.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 02/24
  2. Feb 19, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Housing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Housing Committee, Commissioner of Social Services, Secretary of the State and 3 more
OrganizationHousing Committee“Committee that introduced Senate Bill 253”Map →
PersonCommissioner of Social Services“State official who enters into agreements regarding special need benefits for se”Map →
PersonSecretary of the State“Official appointed as attorney for service of process for non-resident landlords”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Administrative Services“State agency handling referrals for unreturned security deposits”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Social Services“State agency receiving security deposit refunds under assistance programs”Map →
PersonRob Sampson“State Senator for the 16th District, cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy70
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record