POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on FDIC's Role in Operation Choke Point

Original title: THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE. CORPORATION'S ROLE IN. OPERATION CHOKE POINT

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examines the extent of federal regulatory influence over banking relationships and the transparency of the FDIC in responding to congressional inquiries regarding its enforcement policies.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

FDIC

The agency is the subject of congressional oversight regarding its regulatory enforcement policies.

Financial Institutions

Banks and financial entities are subject to the regulatory guidance and enforcement actions discussed under Operation Choke Point.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing investigating the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's (FDIC) involvement in '.' The hearing focused on the agency's regulatory actions and cooperation with congressional oversight requests.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 24, 2015, before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
  • The primary subject was the FDIC's role in 'Operation Choke Point,' a federal initiative targeting high-risk business sectors.
  • Martin J. Gruenberg, Chairman of the FDIC, served as the primary witness.
  • The subcommittee chairman noted that the FDIC and its staff had been responsive to document requests and questioning prior to the hearing.
  • The subcommittee chairman expressed concern regarding White House interference in the committee's cooperation with the FDIC.
  • The hearing record includes written statements from the Electronic Funds Transfer Association (EFTA) and the Electronic Transactions Association (ETA).
  • The record includes written responses from Chairman Gruenberg to follow-up questions from Representatives Luetkemeyer and Mulvaney.

Why It Matters

The hearing examines the extent of federal regulatory influence over banking relationships and the transparency of the FDIC in responding to congressional inquiries regarding its enforcement policies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to investigate the FDIC's involvement in '' and to review the agency's regulatory activities.
Who testified at the hearing?
Martin J. Gruenberg, the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), was the primary witness.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Congressional-Executive Friction

The hearing transcript highlights explicit tension between the House Subcommittee and the White House regarding the level of cooperation provided by the FDIC.

Connected Entities

organizationFederal Deposit Insurance CorporationFederal agency under review regarding its regulatory practicesMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Financial ServicesCongressional committee conducting the oversight hearingMap →
personSean P. DuffyChairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and InvestigationsMap →
personMartin J. GruenbergChairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record