POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho restricts wildland firefighter differential pay to temporary seasonal staff

Original title: WILDLAND FIREFIGHTERS – Amends existing law to provide an exception to wildland firefighter differential pay.

Last action · March 25, 2026: Take bill off General Orders; referred to Resources & Conservation

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

WILDLAND FIREFIGHTERS – Amends existing law to provide an exception to wildland firefighter differential pay.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Wildland firefighters

Temporary seasonal firefighters remain eligible for 25% differential pay, while permanent employees with firefighting roles are explicitly excluded from receiving it.

Key Facts

  • Amends Section 59-1603 and Section 67-5309D, Idaho Code, to establish an exception for wildland firefighter differential pay.
  • Limits 25% hourly differential pay strictly to temporary returning seasonal firefighters and temporary first-year seasonal firefighters.
  • Excludes permanent employees who have a firefighting role or hold current incident qualification cards from receiving the differential pay.
  • Requires firefighters receiving the differential to hold current incident qualification cards while working on the fireline of an uncontrolled fire or at a helibase servicing active flights.
Show all 5 facts
  • Sets an emergency effective date of July 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible for the wildland firefighter differential pay under this bill?
Only temporary returning seasonal firefighters and temporary first-year seasonal firefighters who hold current incident qualification cards and work on uncontrolled firelines or active helibases are eligible.
Are permanent state employees with firefighting roles eligible for the differential pay?
No. The bill explicitly states that the shall not apply to permanent employees who have a firefighting role or hold current incident qualification cards.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 25, 2026Committee
    Take bill off General Orders; referred to Resources & Conservation
  2. Mar 19, 2026
    Reported out of Committee, Recommend place on General Orders
  3. Mar 12, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Resources & Conservation
  4. Mar 12, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

State Board of Examiners, Legislative Services Office, State Controller's Office and 2 more
OrganizationState Board of Examiners“Approves exceptions to salary award limits.”Map →
OrganizationLegislative Services Office“Receives annual reports on employee awards and bonuses.”Map →
OrganizationState Controller's Office“Maintains specific pay codes for tracking authorized pay actions.”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Financial Management“Receives annual reports on employee awards and bonuses.”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Human Resources“Promulgates rules and oversees personnel standards.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record