The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Minnesota authorizes counties and cities to conduct state and federal criminal background checks for adult entertainment and massage business license applicants
Last action · May 5, 2025: Third reading Passed pg. 4446 vote: 65-0Sponsors: Bernie Perryman and 8 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Local units of government authorized to conduct criminal background checks under certain circumstances.
Business license applicants for specific industries face mandatory fingerprinting and federal criminal history checks, and failing to cooperate allows local governments to deny their applications.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
applicants for licensure
Applicants seeking licenses for adult entertainment or massage services must submit fingerprints, consent forms, and fees, and face potential license denial if they do not cooperate.
counties or cities
Local governments gain explicit authority to investigate the criminal history of certain business license applicants and use the results to determine licensure eligibility.
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
The bureau is required to process state criminal history checks, coordinate with the FBI for national checks, and return the results to the local government.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which businesses are subject to these criminal background checks?
What happens if an applicant refuses to cooperate with the background check?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
20 actions- May 5, 2025SenateFloorThird reading Passed pg. 4446 vote: 65-0
- May 5, 2025SenateSpecial Order
- May 5, 2025HouseReturned from Senate
- Apr 1, 2025SenateFloorSecond reading
- Apr 1, 2025SenateComm report: To pass
- Mar 24, 2025SenateCommitteeComm report: To pass and re-referred to State and Local Government
Show 14 earlier actions
- Mar 10, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Judiciary and Public Safety
- Mar 10, 2025SenateIntroducedIntroduction and first reading
- Mar 10, 2025SenateReceived from House
- Mar 10, 2025HouseAuthor added Bahner
- Mar 6, 2025HouseAuthors added Robbins, Kotyza-Witthuhn, and Pursell
- Mar 6, 2025HouseFloorBill was passed pg. 587 vote: 132-0
- Mar 6, 2025HouseFloorThird reading
- Mar 5, 2025HouseHouse rule 1.21, placed on Calendar for the Day Thursday, March 6, 2025
- Feb 26, 2025HouseFloorSecond reading
- Feb 26, 2025HouseCommittee report, to adopt as amended
- Feb 24, 2025HouseAuthor added Virnig
- Feb 17, 2025HouseCommitteeCommittee report, to adopt and re-refer to Elections Finance and Government Operations
- Feb 13, 2025HouseAuthors added Curran, Engen and Tabke
- Feb 10, 2025HouseIntroducedIntroduction and first reading, referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.revisor.mn.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance45How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
