POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on Maritime Security in the Asia-Pacific Region

Original title: MARITIME SECURITY STRATEGY IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing outlines the U.S. government's strategic posture toward China, which directly influences defense spending, regional military deployments, and international trade policies affecting the $5 trillion in annual ship-borne trade passing through the South China Sea.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Department of Defense

The agency is responsible for implementing the maritime security strategy and managing military responses to regional developments.

International shipping and trade industries

These entities rely on the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea for the movement of $5 trillion in annual trade.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Armed Services held a hearing to discuss U.S. maritime security strategy in the Asia-Pacific region, focusing on China's military modernization and territorial claims. The committee reviewed concerns regarding China's land reclamation in the South China Sea, cyber attacks, and the impact of these activities on international trade and regional stability.

Key Facts

  • China has reclaimed nearly 3,000 acres of land in the South China Sea.
  • China is building military infrastructure on reclaimed land, including garrisons, harbors, surveillance systems, and at least three airstrips.
  • Approximately $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes through the South China Sea annually.
  • China established an air defense identification zone over parts of the East China Sea in 2013.
  • The U.S. government attributes recent cyber attacks, including the Office of Personnel Management breach, to China.
  • The hearing took place on September 17, 2015, in the Hart Senate Office Building.
  • The committee received testimony regarding the U.S. goal to maintain a balance of power in the Asia-Pacific region.

Why It Matters

This hearing outlines the U.S. government's strategic posture toward China, which directly influences defense spending, regional military deployments, and international trade policies affecting the $5 trillion in annual ship-borne trade passing through the South China Sea.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary concern regarding China's activities in the South China Sea?
The committee expressed concern over China's rapid land reclamation and the construction of military facilities, which the committee argues are used to assert sovereignty and change the regional status quo.
How does the U.S. view the South China Sea in terms of trade?
The U.S. views the South China Sea as a vital economic artery, noting that approximately $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes through the region every year.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift in U.S.-China Relations

The hearing marks a transition from a policy of engagement to one of heightened concern regarding China's military expansion and cyber activities.

Connected Entities

personHarry B. Harris, Jr.Admiral, Commander U.S. Pacific CommandMap →
personAsh CarterSecretary of DefenseMap →
personDavid B. ShearAssistant Secretary of Defense for Asian and Pacific Security AffairsMap →
personJohn McCainChairman of the Senate Committee on Armed ServicesMap →
locationChinaPrimary subject of security concerns regarding territorial claims and military aMap →
locationSouth China SeaRegion of focus for land reclamation and territorial disputesMap →
organizationOffice of Personnel ManagementTarget of a cyber breach discussed during the hearingMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record