POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Blockchain and Energy Infrastructure

Original title: THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF BLOCKCHAIN AND SIMILAR TECHNOLOGIES AND THE CYBERSECURITY POSSIBILITIES OF SUCH TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing explored the potential integration of into the national energy grid, which could influence future federal policies regarding energy security, grid modernization, and technology standards.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Energy Industry

The industry is the subject of potential technological shifts in grid management and cybersecurity protocols discussed in the hearing.

Federal Energy Regulators

These agencies are responsible for evaluating the policy implications of adopting new technologies like blockchain in critical infrastructure.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held a hearing on August 21, 2018, to examine how technology could impact energy infrastructure and cybersecurity. The discussion focused on the potential for these technologies to transform the energy grid and the technical realities behind their implementation.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on August 21, 2018, in Room SD-366 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The primary objective was to evaluate the energy efficiency and cybersecurity potential of blockchain technology within the energy industry.
  • The committee heard testimony from experts representing national laboratories, research institutes, and academia.
  • The hearing established a formal record including written testimony and responses to questions for the record from five expert witnesses.
  • Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County submitted a statement for the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to investigate whether and similar technologies could improve the energy efficiency and cybersecurity of the U.S. energy grid.
Who provided expert testimony?
Experts from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Electric Power Research Institute, Energy Web Foundation, Princeton University, and the Corporation for National Research Initiatives testified.

Why It Matters

This hearing explored the potential integration of into the national energy grid, which could influence future federal policies regarding energy security, grid modernization, and technology standards.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Early Federal Interest in Blockchain

The hearing demonstrates that the Senate was actively investigating the utility of blockchain for critical infrastructure as early as 2018.

Connected Entities

personThomas A. GoldenProgram Manager, Technology Innovation, Electric Power Research InstituteMap →
organizationCommittee on Energy and Natural ResourcesU.S. Senate committee conducting the hearingMap →
personMaria CantwellRanking Member of the Committee on Energy and Natural ResourcesMap →
personLisa MurkowskiChairman of the Committee on Energy and Natural ResourcesMap →
personRobert E. KahnPresident and CEO, Corporation for National Research InitiativesMap →
personClaire HenlyManaging Director, Energy Web FoundationMap →
personPaul SkareChief Cyber Security Program Manager, Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryMap →
personArvind NarayananAssociate Professor of Computer Science, Princeton UniversityMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record