POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Data Security and Breach Notification Reform

Original title: LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS TO REFORM THE CURRENT DATA SECURITY AND BREACH NOTIFICATION REGULATORY REGIME

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing explored potential federal standards for data security and , which could replace or supplement existing state-level laws that dictate how companies must protect consumer information and inform the public when that information is compromised.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Consumers

Changes to data security laws impact how and when individuals are notified if their personal information is exposed in a data breach.

Financial Institutions

These entities are subject to data security regulations and would be required to comply with any new federal standards established by potential legislation.

Retailers

Retailers handle consumer data and are subject to existing breach notification requirements that could be altered by federal reform.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript and record of a March 7, 2018, House subcommittee hearing regarding potential legislative changes to how companies handle data security and notify consumers of data breaches. The hearing featured testimony from state government officials and industry representatives regarding the current regulatory landscape.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on March 7, 2018, before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
  • The session focused on legislative proposals to reform the current regulatory regime for data security and breach notification.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, the Consumer Data Industry Association, the Information Technology Industry Council, and the Financial Services Roundtable.
  • The record includes extensive written statements from various trade associations, including the American Bankers Association, the National Retail Federation, and the Credit Union National Association.
  • The hearing record contains formal responses to questions submitted by Representatives Waters and Ross regarding the testimony provided.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss legislative proposals aimed at reforming how data security and s are regulated at the federal level.
Who testified at the hearing?
Testimony was provided by Sara Cable (Massachusetts Attorney General's Office), Francis Creighton (Consumer Data Industry Association), John S. Miller (Information Technology Industry Council), and Jason Kratovil (Financial Services Roundtable).

Why It Matters

The hearing explored potential federal standards for data security and , which could replace or supplement existing state-level laws that dictate how companies must protect consumer information and inform the public when that information is compromised.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Broad Industry Participation

The hearing record includes submissions from a wide range of competing interests, including both the banking sector and the retail sector, indicating high-stakes lobbying on data security standards.

Connected Entities

personJason KratovilVice President of the Financial Services Roundtable.Map →
personSara CableDirector of Data Privacy and Security, Massachusetts Attorney General's Office.Map →
organizationSubcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer CreditThe House subcommittee that held the hearing.Map →
personFrancis CreightonPresident and CEO of the Consumer Data Industry Association.Map →
personJohn S. MillerVice President of Global Policy and Law, Information Technology Industry CouncilMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record