POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofFish →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Montana Eliminates Land-Purchase Contracts for Landowner Elk Hunting Licenses and Sets Strict Employee Rules

Original title: Revising landowner preference qualifications for elk to require finalized land ownership of 640 acres or more of contiguous land

Last action · May 8, 2025: Chapter Number AssignedSponsor: Kenneth Bogner

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Montana Senate Bill 235 eliminates being under contract to purchase 640 or more contiguous acres as a qualification for landowner-preference elk licenses and special elk permits, requiring actual finalized land ownership instead. The law also establishes a precise definition for an 'employee' whom a landowner may designate to receive these permits, taking effect immediately upon passage and approval.

Why it matters

Landowners who are currently in the process of buying large properties through purchase contracts will no longer qualify for preferential elk permits until ownership is fully finalized. Additionally, designated worker permits now require workers to have state or federal taxes withheld from their pay or work full-time and year-round on active farm and ranch operations.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Landowners

Must own at least 640 contiguous acres outright rather than being under purchase contract to qualify for elk preference licenses and permits.

Directly affected

Agricultural corporations

Retain the ability to designate one shareholder to apply for or receive landowner elk permits if they own qualifying land.

Directly affected

Landowner employees and family members

Must meet stricter definitions regarding tax withholding and full-time, year-round farm or ranch work to be eligible for designated permits.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I still qualify for landowner elk permits if I am currently buying land under a purchase contract?
No. Senate Bill 235 eliminates purchase contracts as a qualifying condition. Applicants must now own 640 acres or more of outright.
Who can a landowner designate to receive their elk permit instead of themselves?
A landowner may designate an immediate family member or a qualifying employee. If it is a corporation owning the land, one shareholder may be designated.
How does the law define a qualifying employee for elk permits?
For Class A-9 and B-12 licenses, an employee is someone paid by the landowner with state or federal taxes withheld. For special elk permits, the employee must also work full-time and year-round as part of the active farm or ranch operation.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

41 actions
  1. May 8, 2025Senate
    Chapter Number Assigned
  2. May 5, 2025SenateEnrolled
    (S) Signed by Governor
  3. Apr 25, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to Governor
  4. Apr 25, 2025House
    (H) Signed by Speaker
  5. Apr 21, 2025Senate
    (S) Signed by President
  6. Apr 14, 2025Senate
    (S) Returned from Enrolling
Show 35 earlier actions
  1. Apr 14, 2025Senate
    (S) Sent to Enrolling
  2. Apr 12, 2025Senate
    (S) 3rd Reading House Amendments
  3. Apr 12, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  4. Apr 11, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading House Amendments
  5. Apr 11, 2025Senate
    (S) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  6. Apr 9, 2025House
    (H) Returned to Senate with Amendments
  7. Apr 9, 2025House
    (H) 3rd Reading
  8. Apr 9, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 3rd Reading
  9. Apr 8, 2025House
    (H) 2nd Reading
  10. Apr 8, 2025House
    (H) Scheduled for 2nd Reading
  11. Apr 2, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Report
  12. Apr 1, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Committee Executive Action
  13. Mar 17, 2025House
    (H) Hearing
  14. Feb 22, 2025House
    (H) 1st Reading
  15. Feb 22, 2025HouseCommittee
    (H) Referred to Committee
  16. Feb 21, 2025Senate
    (S) Transmitted to House
  17. Feb 21, 2025Senate
    (S) 3rd Reading
  18. Feb 19, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading
  19. Feb 19, 2025Senate
    (S) 2nd Reading Motion to Amend
  20. Feb 14, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Report
  21. Feb 13, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Committee Executive Action
  22. Jan 30, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  23. Jan 30, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  24. Jan 29, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  25. Jan 29, 2025SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  26. Jan 29, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  27. Jan 25, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  28. Jan 22, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  29. Jan 21, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  30. Jan 21, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  31. Jan 20, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  32. Jan 20, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  33. Jan 20, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Taken Off Hold
  34. Nov 4, 2024House
    (LC) Draft On Hold
  35. Nov 4, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Kenneth Bogner
PersonKenneth Bogner“Republican Senator, District 18, who introduced SB 235.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record