POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on the OPM Data Breach

Original title: IS THE OPM DATA BREACH THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG?

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2015 joint House subcommittee hearing investigating the scope and implications of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) . Lawmakers and expert witnesses discussed the security failures that led to the incident and evaluated the broader state of federal cybersecurity.

Why it matters

The hearing examined the security vulnerabilities of federal personnel records, which impacted millions of current and former federal employees, and assessed the effectiveness of government-wide data protection standards.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Federal employees

Current and former federal employees had their personal data exposed in the OPM breach.

Directly affected

Office of Personnel Management

The agency was the subject of the investigation regarding its data security practices.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on July 8, 2015, by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
  • The primary subject was the OPM data breach and whether it represented a systemic failure in federal cybersecurity.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the OPM Office of the Inspector General, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
  • The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) provided testimony regarding the impact on federal workers.
Show all 6 facts
  • The hearing included formal opening statements from subcommittee chairs and ranking members.
  • The record includes post-hearing responses to questions submitted by committee members to the witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To investigate the OPM and determine if it was an isolated incident or indicative of wider security vulnerabilities across federal agencies.
Who testified at the hearing?
Officials from the OPM 's office, NIST, the GAO, and the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Federal Cybersecurity Standards

The hearing highlights a transition toward more rigorous oversight of federal IT security by the Science, Space, and Technology Committee.

Connected Entities

Barry Loudermilk, Michael R. Esser, Barbara Comstock and 3 more
PersonBarry Loudermilk“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight.”Map →
PersonMichael R. Esser“Assistant Inspector General for Audits at OPM.”Map →
PersonBarbara Comstock“Chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Research and Technology.”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Personnel Management“The federal agency that experienced a major data breach.”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Accountability Office“Provided oversight analysis regarding information security.”Map →
OrganizationNational Institute of Standards and Technology“Provided expert testimony on IT security standards.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment30
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record