Part ofcybersecurity →

FEDERALhearing transcript

High Impact

Congressional Hearing on the OPM Data Breach

Original title: IS THE OPM DATA BREACH THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG?

January 1, 2016

cybersecurity data breach OPM federal government information technology oversight

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examined the security vulnerabilities of federal personnel records, which impacted millions of current and former federal employees, and assessed the effectiveness of government-wide data protection standards.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal employees

Current and former federal employees had their personal data exposed in the OPM breach.

Office of Personnel Management

The agency was the subject of the investigation regarding its data security practices.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2015 joint House subcommittee hearing investigating the scope and implications of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) . Lawmakers and expert witnesses discussed the security failures that led to the incident and evaluated the broader state of federal cybersecurity.

Key Facts

The hearing was held on July 8, 2015, by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
The primary subject was the OPM data breach and whether it represented a systemic failure in federal cybersecurity.
Witnesses included representatives from the OPM Office of the Inspector General, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association (NARFE) provided testimony regarding the impact on federal workers.
The hearing included formal opening statements from subcommittee chairs and ranking members.
The record includes post-hearing responses to questions submitted by committee members to the witnesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?

To investigate the OPM and determine if it was an isolated incident or indicative of wider security vulnerabilities across federal agencies.

Who testified at the hearing?

Officials from the OPM 's office, NIST, the GAO, and the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association.

Why It Matters

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Federal Cybersecurity Standards

The hearing highlights a transition toward more rigorous oversight of federal IT security by the Science, Space, and Technology Committee.

National Institute of Standards and Technology Office of Personnel Management

Connected Entities

personBarry Loudermilk“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight.”Map →

personMichael R. Esser“Assistant Inspector General for Audits at OPM.”Map →

organizationOffice of Personnel Management“The federal agency that experienced a major data breach.”Map →

personBarbara Comstock“Chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Research and Technology.”Map →

organizationGovernment Accountability Office“Provided oversight analysis regarding information security.”Map →

organizationNational Institute of Standards and Technology“Provided expert testimony on IT security standards.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance85
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy60
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment30
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz20
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools