POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

South Dakota Requests Attorney General Sue China for $100 Billion in COVID-19 Damages

Original title: requesting the attorney general file a lawsuit against the People's Republic of China and related parties to seek damages related to the COVID-19 global pandemic.

Last action · February 6, 2026: Deferred to the 41st legislative daySponsors: Brandei Schaefbauer and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

South Dakota lawmakers introduced a concurrent resolution urging the state attorney general to file or join a lawsuit against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, and related entities for $100 billion in damages related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Why it matters

Establishes a formal legislative request for state legal action and proposes creating a relief fund to distribute up to $250,000 per impacted resident, though concurrent resolutions do not carry the binding force of enacted statutes.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

South Dakota residents

Eligible to receive up to $250,000 from the proposed relief fund upon proof of pandemic-related losses if funds are secured.

Directly affected

medical providers

Identified as having faced undue cost and strain during the pandemic and eligible for compensation through the proposed relief framework.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does House Concurrent Resolution 6008 ask the state to do?
It asks the attorney general to file a lawsuit seeking $100 billion in damages from the People's Republic of China and related parties for the COVID-19 pandemic.
Would individuals receive any money recovered from the lawsuit?
Yes, the resolution proposes creating a relief fund to distribute up to $250,000 per impacted person upon proof of losses directly attributable to the pandemic.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 6, 2026House
    Deferred to the 41st legislative day
  2. Feb 6, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  3. Feb 2, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to
  4. Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First Reading House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

People's Liberation Army, People's Republic of China, Chinese Communist Party
OrganizationPeople's Liberation Army“Associated with the BSL-4 laboratory in Wuhan”Map →
locationPeople's Republic of China“Target of requested litigation”Map →
OrganizationChinese Communist Party“Target of requested litigation”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment25
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record