The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.South Dakota Requests Attorney General Sue China for $100 Billion in COVID-19 Damages
Last action · February 6, 2026: Deferred to the 41st legislative daySponsors: Brandei Schaefbauer and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
South Dakota lawmakers introduced a concurrent resolution urging the state attorney general to file or join a lawsuit against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party, and related entities for $100 billion in damages related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Establishes a formal legislative request for state legal action and proposes creating a relief fund to distribute up to $250,000 per impacted resident, though concurrent resolutions do not carry the binding force of enacted statutes.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
South Dakota residents
Eligible to receive up to $250,000 from the proposed relief fund upon proof of pandemic-related losses if funds are secured.
medical providers
Identified as having faced undue cost and strain during the pandemic and eligible for compensation through the proposed relief framework.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does House Concurrent Resolution 6008 ask the state to do?
Would individuals receive any money recovered from the lawsuit?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
4 actions- Feb 6, 2026HouseDeferred to the 41st legislative day
- Feb 6, 2026HouseScheduled for hearing
- Feb 2, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to
- Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroducedFirst Reading House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
sdlegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment25Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz45Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
