POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S3726FEDERALin_committee
High Impact

National Veterans Strategy Act of 2026

January 29, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently in_committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Last action
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.Apr 29, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

This bill would establish a new federal framework for how veteran benefits and services are measured and delivered, potentially changing how federal agencies and grant recipients track and report the effectiveness of their programs.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Veterans

The bill establishes new metrics for their well-being and mandates a national strategy to coordinate the services and benefits they receive.

Federal Agencies

Agencies must participate in strategy development and are required to use standardized metrics to evaluate the outcomes of their programs.

Federal Grant Recipients

Nonprofits and state/local governments receiving federal grants must apply standardized metrics as a condition of continued funding.

What changed

Current stage: in_committee.

What's next

Floor Vote.

Summary

This bill requires the President to define 'veteran success' and create a comprehensive national strategy every four years to coordinate veteran services across government, nonprofit, and private sectors. It mandates the use of standardized metrics to measure veteran well-being and requires federal agencies and grant recipients to use these metrics to evaluate program outcomes.

Key Facts

  • The President must establish metrics to measure veteran well-being in areas including physical/mental health, economic security, education, and civic engagement.
  • The President must submit a National Veterans Strategy to Congress at least once every four years.
  • The strategy must coordinate resources across federal, state, local, tribal, nonprofit, and private sector organizations.
  • The strategy must include methods to evaluate veteran well-being and provide direction on how to assist veterans who do not meet success metrics.
  • Federal agencies and grant recipients must apply standardized outcome metrics as a condition for receiving federal grants.
  • The President must consult with a wide range of stakeholders, including Congress, various Cabinet Secretaries, state/local governments, and veterans service organizations.
  • The strategy must account for diverse veteran demographics, including age, geography, sex, race, disability, and family status.
  • Congress retains the authority to disapprove the President's strategy via a joint resolution within 60 days of submission.
  • The strategy may delineate which organizations provide specific services and the order in which benefits should be delivered.

Why It Matters

This bill would establish a new federal framework for how veteran benefits and services are measured and delivered, potentially changing how federal agencies and grant recipients track and report the effectiveness of their programs.

Frequently Asked Questions

How will the government define 'veteran success'?
The President is required to establish specific metrics covering physical and mental health, economic opportunity, education, and social/civic engagement.
Can Congress stop the President's strategy?
Yes, Congress can pass a to disapprove the strategy within 60 days of receiving it.
Will this affect how veterans receive benefits?
The bill directs the strategy to prescribe how services and benefits should be applied to maximize efficiency and effectiveness, and requires agencies to use standardized metrics to evaluate outcomes.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

AARP

$4,110,000

2026

HEALTH ISSUESMEDICARE/MEDICAIDLAW ENFORCEMENT/CRIME/CRIMINAL JUSTICEPHARMACY

P.L. 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act H.R. 8867, Planning for Long-term Aging Needs (PLAN) Act H.R. 5861, Legacy Act of 2025 H.R. 9393, the Lower Costs, More Transparency Act. H.R. 9396, the Prior Authorization Accountability Act. S. 4916, the Aging with Artificial Intelligence Act. H.R. 8100, Safe Staffing Saves Lives Act. S. 3886, Nurses Belong in Nursing Homes Act. H.R. 6766/S. 3492, the Essential Caregivers Act of 2025. H.R. 7966/S. 4118, Hospice Care Accountability, Reform, and Enforcement (Hospice CARE) Act. S. 2120, the Older Americans Act Reauthorization Act of 2025 H.R. 5575, the Firefighters Assisting Seniors to Emergency Response (FASTER) Act of 2025. H.R. 3954/S. 4641, Improving Access to Medicare Coverage Act. H.R.5554/S.2831, Stand Strong for Medicare Act. S. 3439/H.R. 6735, Connecting Caregivers to Medicare Act and efforts related to the bill S. 1227/H.R. 2491, Alleviating Barriers for Caregivers Act S. 668/H.R. 3183, Supporting Access to Falls Education and Prevention and Strengthening Training Efforts and Promoting Safety Initiatives (SAFE STEPS) for Veterans Act of 2025 CMS-1851-P, Hospice Proposed rule. CMS-1843-P, Skilled Nursing Facility Proposed rule. CMS-1844-P, Home Health Proposed rule. No bill number. Health care transparency. No bill number. Discussed use of artificial intelligence and health data technology. No bill number. Discussed health-related policies and activities around the fall respiratory virus season. No bill number. Discussed health insurance affordability proposals. No bill number. Discussed Nursing Home staffing standards, safety, and quality. No bill number. Discussed Nursing home transparency and ownership requirements. No bill number. Discussed home health, hospice, and long-term care. No bill number. Discussed falls prevention. No bill number. Discussed social isolation. No bill number. Discussed HUD Assisted Living Requirements No bill number. Discussed family caregiving. No bill number. Discussed AARP paper on Medicare Caregiver Training Services. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid community engagement interim final rule, including the family caregiver exemption. No bill number. Discussed the paid direct care workforce in long-term care. No bill number. Discussed the unaffordability of long-term care. No bill number. Discussed Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration Program and Medicaid HCBS spousal impoverishment protections. No bill number. Discussed Medicaid fraud and family caregivers, Medicaid self-direction programs. No bill number. Discussed sandwich generation family caregiver hearing and submitted a statement for the record discussing family caregivers and sandwich generation caregivers, programs that support them, AARP caregiving resources, and federal policies to support sandwich generation caregivers and caregivers more broadly. No bill number. Discussed long-term care. No bill number. CMS-2453-NC; Medicaid Program; 2028 Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Quality Measure Set Submitted comments No bill number. Discussed expanding access to home care. No bill number. Discussed the increasing cost of home care No bill number. Discussed HSA use for telehealth chronic care management services/subscriptions. No bill number. Discussed artificial intelligence and technology

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Standardization of Veteran Outcomes

The bill shifts from decentralized service delivery to a mandate for uniform, standardized metrics across all federal agencies and grant recipients.

Connected Entities

personJerry MoranSenator who introduced the billMap →
personPresident of the United StatesResponsible for defining success and creating the strategyMap →
personRichard BlumenthalSenator who co-sponsored the billMap →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record