House Armed Services Committee Hearing: Global Security Threats
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing sets the legislative agenda for the House Armed Services Committee regarding future defense spending, military organizational reform, and national security priorities for the 115th Congress.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Department of Defense
The committee is planning legislative reforms regarding the department's organization, acquisition, and personnel.
U.S. Military Personnel
The committee is reviewing policies related to the intellectual development and management of service members.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on February 1, 2017, as the first session of the 115th Congress.
- Chairman Thornberry stated that the U.S. military has grown smaller and been impacted by budget cuts.
- The committee plans to pursue defense reforms in organization, acquisition, authorities, and personnel.
- The committee aims to move away from Cold War-era systems toward more agile defense structures.
- Witnesses John E. McLaughlin and GEN David H. Petraeus provided expert testimony on global threats.
- Post-hearing questions were submitted by Representatives Langevin, O'Rourke, Stefanik, and others.
Why It Matters
This hearing sets the legislative agenda for the House Armed Services Committee regarding future defense spending, military organizational reform, and national security priorities for the 115th Congress.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Shift toward defense agility
The committee explicitly signaled a move away from Cold War-era defense structures toward more agile acquisition and organizational models.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools