POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Senate Hearing on Federal Reserve Board Nominations

Original title: NOMINATIONS OF RICHARD CLARIDA AND MICHELLE W. BOWMAN

Record date · January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs held a hearing on May 15, 2018, to consider the s of Richard Clarida and Michelle W. Bowman to the . The hearing included opening statements, nominee introductions, and the submission of biographical and background materials for the record.

Why it matters

This hearing represents the formal vetting process for two individuals nominated to lead the Federal Reserve, the institution responsible for setting U.S. monetary policy and overseeing the nation's banking system.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Richard Clarida

The nominee is undergoing the Senate confirmation process for a position on the Federal Reserve Board.

Directly affected

Michelle W. Bowman

The nominee is undergoing the Senate confirmation process for a position on the Federal Reserve Board.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on May 15, 2018, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • Richard Clarida was nominated to be a Member and Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
  • Michelle W. Bowman was nominated to be a Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
  • Richard Clarida previously served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy (2002-2003) and as a senior staff economist with the Council of Economic Advisers (1986-1987).
Show all 8 facts
  • At the time of the hearing, Richard Clarida served as managing director and global strategic advisor at PIMCO.
  • The record includes responses to written questions from several Senators, including Senators Brown, Reed, Menendez, Warner, Warren, and Cortez Masto.
  • The record includes a list of Federal Reserve enforcement actions from January 2015 to May 2018.
  • The record includes letters of support for the nominees from various organizations, including the ICBA.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to evaluate the qualifications of Richard Clarida and Michelle W. Bowman for their respective s to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
Who oversees the Federal Reserve nominations?
The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs is responsible for reviewing these s.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Historical Enforcement Data

The hearing record includes a specific list of Federal Reserve enforcement actions from 2015-2018, providing transparency into the regulatory environment at the time.

Connected Entities

Michelle W. Bowman, Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Federal Reserve System and 2 more
PersonMichelle W. Bowman“Nominee for Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs“The committee responsible for conducting the nomination hearing.”Map →
OrganizationFederal Reserve System“The central banking system of the United States.”Map →
PersonMike Crapo“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.”Map →
PersonRichard Clarida“Nominee for Member and Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Re”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record