POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Future of Weather Research Hearing

Original title: WHAT'S THE FORECAST: A LOOK AT THE FUTURE OF WEATHER RESEARCH

Record date · January 1, 2023

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House on Environment held a hearing on June 14, 2022, to discuss the future of weather research and forecasting technology. The session featured testimony from academic and private-sector experts regarding advancements in meteorological science.

Why it matters

This hearing serves as a foundational discussion for potential future federal funding and policy priorities regarding weather forecasting infrastructure and climate research.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Meteorological research community

The research priorities and potential future funding discussed in this hearing impact the direction of academic and private weather research.

Indirectly affected

General public

Improvements in weather forecasting research may eventually lead to more accurate weather predictions for the public.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on June 14, 2022, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The session focused on the future of weather research and forecasting capabilities.
  • Witnesses included experts from Rutgers University, the American Meteorological Society, the University of Oklahoma, and Spire Global, Inc.
  • The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Environment under the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Show all 5 facts
  • A letter from Michael E. Bryson of PJM was submitted for the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather expert testimony on the future of weather research and to discuss advancements in the field.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses were Dr. Scott Glenn (Rutgers University), Dr. Bradley Colman (American Meteorological Society), Dr. Fred Carr (University of Oklahoma), and Dr. Kevin R. Petty (Spire Global, Inc.).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Public-Private Collaboration

The inclusion of a witness from Spire Global, Inc. alongside academic researchers highlights a growing trend of integrating private-sector data into federal weather research.

Connected Entities

Fred Carr, Scott Glenn, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and 4 more
PersonFred Carr“Witness, University of Oklahoma”Map →
PersonScott Glenn“Witness, Rutgers University”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Science, Space, and Technology“Congressional committee overseeing the hearing”Map →
PersonBradley Colman“Witness, American Meteorological Society”Map →
PersonMikie Sherrill“Chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Environment”Map →
PersonStephanie I. Bice“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Environment”Map →
PersonKevin R. Petty“Witness, Spire Global, Inc.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record