POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Hearing on Closing the Federal IT Talent Gap

Original title: CLOSING THE TALENT GAP IN FEDERAL IT

Record date · January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Subcommittee on Information Technology held a hearing on September 22, 2016, to discuss strategies for addressing the shortage of skilled IT and cybersecurity professionals within the federal government. The session featured testimony from experts in education, private industry, and workforce training programs.

Why it matters

This hearing explores how the federal government can recruit and retain the technical workforce necessary to manage government IT systems and cybersecurity, which impacts the security and efficiency of public services.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Federal IT workforce

The hearing addresses recruitment, training, and retention policies that directly impact federal IT employees.

Indirectly affected

STEM education providers

Educational institutions and training programs are involved in discussions regarding how to prepare students for federal IT careers.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on September 22, 2016, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The primary objective was to address the 'talent gap' in federal information technology roles.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the National Science Foundation, Intel Security, Alamo Academies, and Blue1647.
  • The Chairman submitted his opening statement for the record to expedite the hearing due to time constraints.
Show all 5 facts
  • The record was held open for five legislative days for additional member statements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to examine the challenges the federal government faces in recruiting and retaining skilled IT and cybersecurity professionals.
Who testified at the hearing?
The witnesses included Dr. Joan Ferrini-Mundy (National Science Foundation), Mr. Scott Montgomery (Intel Security), Mr. Gene Bowman (Alamo Academies), and Mr. Emile Cambry (Blue1647).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Focus on Public-Private Partnerships

The inclusion of witnesses from private industry (Intel) and non-profit training (Blue1647) alongside government agencies indicates a strategy of looking outside the federal government for workforce solutions.

Connected Entities

Robin L. Kelly, Emile Cambry, Subcommittee on Information Technology and 4 more
PersonRobin L. Kelly“Ranking Minority Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonEmile Cambry“Founder, Blue1647”Map →
OrganizationSubcommittee on Information Technology“House of Representatives committee conducting the hearing”Map →
PersonJoan Ferrini-Mundy“Assistant Director, Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation”Map →
PersonGene Bowman“Executive Director, Alamo Academies”Map →
PersonWill Hurd“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Information Technology”Map →
PersonScott Montgomery“Vice President and Chief Technical Strategist, Intel Security”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record