POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Hearing on Large-Scale Carbon Management Technologies

Original title: THE DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF LARGE-SCALE CARBON DIOXIDE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN THE UNITED STATES, INCLUDING TECHNOLOGICAL AND NATURAL CARBON REMOVAL, CARBON UTILIZATION, AND CARBON STORAGE

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative interest in federal funding and policy support for carbon management technologies, which could influence future energy infrastructure and climate mitigation strategies.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Energy industry

The industry is subject to potential future regulations or incentives regarding carbon management and emissions reduction.

Climate policy researchers

Researchers provide the data and technological assessments that inform federal energy policy and funding priorities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources held a hearing on July 28, 2020, to discuss the development and deployment of technologies for carbon removal, utilization, and storage. The session explored how these technologies can be scaled to reduce emissions and address climate change impacts.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on July 28, 2020, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
  • The committee examined three primary areas: carbon removal, carbon utilization, and carbon storage.
  • The hearing was originally scheduled for March 2020 but was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Senator Lisa Murkowski noted that carbon removal, once focused primarily on tree planting, is now being viewed as a scalable technological solution.
  • Senator John Barrasso has advocated for a technology prize for direct air capture for over a decade.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the Energy Futures Initiative, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Carbon Utilization Research Council, Columbia University, and the Bipartisan Policy Center.

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative interest in federal funding and policy support for carbon management technologies, which could influence future energy infrastructure and climate mitigation strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to gather expert testimony on the current state and future potential of technologies designed to capture, store, and use carbon dioxide to reduce emissions.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included Ernest J. Moniz (Energy Futures Initiative), Steven E. Winberg (Department of Energy), Shannon Angielski ( Research Council), Dr. S. Julio Friedmann (Columbia University), Sasha Mackler (Bipartisan Policy Center), and Joseph Hezir (Energy Futures Initiative).

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

temporal pattern100% confidence

COVID-19 Delay

The hearing was delayed from March 2020 to July 2020 due to the pandemic, illustrating the disruption of legislative schedules during that period.

Connected Entities

personErnest J. MonizWitness, CEO of Energy Futures InitiativeMap →
personJoe Manchin IIIRanking Member of the CommitteeMap →
organizationCommittee on Energy and Natural ResourcesU.S. Senate committee overseeing the hearingMap →
personSteven E. WinbergWitness, Assistant Secretary for Fossil EnergyMap →
personJohn BarrassoSenator who proposed a technology prize for direct air captureMap →
personLisa MurkowskiChairman of the Committee on Energy and Natural ResourcesMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record