POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Data Security and Breach Notification Rules

Original title: EXAMINING THE CURRENT DATA SECURITY AND BREACH NOTIFICATION REGULATORY REGIME

Record date · January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript record of a February 14, 2018, House subcommittee hearing. Lawmakers and industry experts met to discuss the effectiveness of current federal and state regulations regarding how companies protect consumer data and notify the public when a security breach occurs.

Why it matters

The hearing explores potential changes to federal data security laws that could alter how financial institutions and other businesses are required to protect consumer information and report data breaches to the public.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Financial Institutions

These entities are subject to current data security regulations and potential future changes to breach notification requirements.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers are the subjects of the data being protected and the recipients of breach notifications when security incidents occur.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on February 14, 2018, by the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit.
  • The session focused on evaluating the existing regulatory framework for data security and breach notification requirements.
  • Five expert witnesses provided testimony regarding industry standards and regulatory gaps.
  • The record includes written statements from various trade associations, including the Independent Community Bankers of America and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Show all 6 facts
  • Witnesses provided written responses to follow-up questions submitted by Representative Denny Heck.
  • The hearing is documented as Serial No. 115-73 of the 115th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The subcommittee met to examine how current laws and regulations govern data security and how companies must notify consumers when their personal data is compromised.
Who testified at the hearing?
Experts from the software industry, credit unions, privacy advocacy groups, legal firms, and policy think tanks provided testimony.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Pre-GDPR Context

The hearing occurred in early 2018, just months before the implementation of the EU's GDPR, which influenced the discussion on U.S. data protection standards.

Connected Entities

Nathan D. Taylor, Kim Sponem, Blaine Luetkemeyer and 3 more
PersonNathan D. Taylor“Witness, Partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP”Map →
PersonKim Sponem“Witness, CEO of Summit Credit Union”Map →
PersonBlaine Luetkemeyer“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit”Map →
PersonAaron Cooper“Witness, Vice President of Global Policy at BSA - The Software Alliance”Map →
PersonPaul Rosenzweig“Witness, Senior Fellow at R Street Institute”Map →
PersonMarc Rotenberg“Witness, President of Electronic Privacy Information Center”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record