POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Reviewing Security and Fraud Controls at HealthCare.gov

Original title: REVIEWING HEALTHCARE.GOV CONTROLS

January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing examines whether federal systems effectively prevent fraudulent enrollment and the improper distribution of taxpayer-funded through the Affordable Care Act exchange.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

The agency is responsible for managing the exchange and responding to findings regarding program integrity and security controls.

Taxpayers

Taxpayers are the source of the premium tax subsidies distributed through the federal exchange.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This Senate Finance Committee hearing reviews a Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation into the security controls of the HealthCare.gov website. The GAO used undercover 'secret shopper' tests to determine if the could detect fraudulent applications and verify documentation for .

Key Facts

  • The GAO conducted an undercover 'secret shopper' investigation to test HealthCare.gov's ability to detect fraudulent applications.
  • In a previous test, 11 out of 12 fictitious applications were approved for premium tax subsidies by the federal exchange.
  • The GAO reported that the federal exchange accepted fabricated documentation without verifying its authenticity.
  • The GAO investigation concluded that the administration had not implemented sufficient changes to address these security issues over the course of a year.
  • The hearing was held on July 16, 2015, by the Senate Committee on Finance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of the GAO's 'secret shopper' investigation?
The investigation was designed to test if HealthCare.gov could identify fraudulent applications and verify the authenticity of documentation submitted for .
What were the findings regarding fake applications?
The GAO reported that 11 out of 12 fictitious applications were approved for subsidies, and the system accepted fabricated documents without verification.

Why It Matters

The hearing examines whether federal systems effectively prevent fraudulent enrollment and the improper distribution of taxpayer-funded through the Affordable Care Act exchange.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Persistent Security Vulnerabilities

The GAO found that security issues identified in previous years remained unaddressed by the administration, suggesting a potential conflict between enrollment speed and program integrity.

Connected Entities

personOrrin G. HatchChairman of the Senate Committee on FinanceMap →
personSeto J. BagdoyanDirector of Forensic Audits and Investigative Service at the GAOMap →
otherHealthCare.govThe federal health insurance exchange websiteMap →
organizationGovernment Accountability OfficeConducted the undercover investigationMap →
organizationCenters for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesResponsible for managing the HealthCare.gov programMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record