Congressional Hearing on the Role and Impact of the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing addresses the potential financial exposure of U.S. taxpayers, who fund over 17% of the IMF's resources, in the event of a major international financial default.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. Taxpayers
Taxpayers are financially exposed to potential losses if the IMF experiences a major default on its loans.
International Monetary Fund
The organization is the subject of congressional oversight regarding its lending policies and resource management.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2016.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The United States is the largest contributor to the IMF, providing over 17% of its total quota resources.
- The IMF consists of 188 member countries.
- The hearing was held on June 17, 2015, by the Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade.
- The subcommittee examined IMF activities including global financial surveillance, technical assistance, and lending.
- The hearing focused on the concept of 'moral hazard' regarding IMF lending practices.
- The subcommittee noted concerns regarding the IMF's history of 'bending the rules' regarding exceptional access to funds.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the IMF?
Why is the U.S. involved in the IMF?
What is 'moral hazard' in this context?
Why It Matters
The hearing addresses the potential financial exposure of U.S. taxpayers, who fund over 17% of the IMF's resources, in the event of a major international financial default.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Focus on IMF Rule-Bending
The subcommittee explicitly highlighted concerns that the IMF has repeatedly bypassed its own rules regarding 'exceptional access' to funding.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools