POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Rhode Island authorizes candidates to use campaign funds for home and office security systems

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO ELECTIONS -- RHODE ISLAND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES REPORTING (Authorizes the use of campaign funds for security related expenses, including home and office security systems and ongoing monitoring, in response to threats arising from their public service or candidacy.)

Last action · June 18, 2026: Signed by GovernorSponsors: Gallo and 9 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Rhode Island law now allows candidates and public officials to use campaign funds to pay for security-related expenses, such as home and office security systems and ongoing monitoring, when facing threats related to their public service or candidacy.

Why it matters

The change alters what candidates are legally permitted to purchase using political donations, shifting personal out-of-pocket safety costs onto campaign accounts for those experiencing threats due to public office.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Candidates and Public Officials

Candidates and public officials are permitted to use campaign accounts to purchase home and office security systems and monitoring services when facing threats.

Key Facts

  • Rhode Island enacted legislation relating to campaign contributions and expenditures reporting under S 2334.
  • The law explicitly authorizes candidates and public officials to use campaign funds to pay for security-related expenses.
  • Eligible security expenses include home and office security systems as well as ongoing monitoring services.
  • The expenditure of campaign funds for security must be in response to threats arising from public service or candidacy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is allowed to use campaign funds for security under this law?
Candidates and public officials facing threats arising from their public service or candidacy are permitted to use campaign funds for security expenses.
What specific security costs are covered by the new law?
The law covers security-related expenses, including home and office security systems and ongoing monitoring.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

22 actions
  1. Jun 18, 2026Enrolled
    Signed by Governor
  2. Jun 16, 2026
    Transmitted to Governor
  3. Jun 11, 2026Floor
    Senate passed Sub B in concurrence
  4. Jun 10, 2026
    Placed on Senate Calendar (06/11/2026)
  5. Jun 10, 2026Floor
    House passed Sub B
  6. Jun 8, 2026
    Placed on House Calendar (06/10/2026)
Show 16 earlier actions
  1. Jun 8, 2026Floor
    Committee recommends passage of Sub B
  2. Jun 5, 2026
    Proposed Substitute
  3. Jun 5, 2026
    Scheduled for consideration (06/08/2026)
  4. May 20, 2026Committee
    Referred to House State Government & Elections
  5. May 19, 2026Floor
    Senate passed Sub A
  6. May 15, 2026
    Placed on Senate Calendar (05/19/2026)
  7. May 14, 2026Floor
    Committee recommends passage of Sub A
  8. May 13, 2026
    Proposed Substitute
  9. May 8, 2026
    Scheduled for consideration (05/14/2026)
  10. Apr 29, 2026
    Meeting postponed (04/29/2026)
  11. Apr 24, 2026
    Scheduled for consideration
  12. Apr 15, 2026
    Committee recommended Substitute A be held for further study
  13. Apr 15, 2026
    Committee recommended indefinite postponement
  14. Apr 14, 2026
    Proposed Substitute
  15. Apr 10, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (04/15/2026)
  16. Jan 23, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to Senate Special Legislation and Veterans Affairs

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Stefano Famiglietti, Ciccone, Matt LaMountain and 7 more
PersonStefano Famiglietti“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonCiccone“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonMatt LaMountain“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonWalter Felag“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonJake Bissaillon“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonGallo“Primary sponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonVictoria Gu“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonJohn Burke“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonDavid Tikoian“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →
PersonMelissa Murray“Cosponsor of S 2334”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record