TREY'S Law: Protecting Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse
March 3, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently passed_chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Signed.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
If passed, this law would invalidate existing and future contract clauses that currently prevent survivors of child sexual abuse from speaking publicly or reporting their experiences to authorities.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Survivors of child sexual abuse
They would gain the legal right to disclose their abuse regardless of any prior nondisclosure agreements they may have signed.
Legal entities and defendants in abuse cases
They would be unable to enforce contract clauses that require silence regarding the underlying facts of child sexual abuse.
Current stage: passed_chamber.
Signed.
Summary
Key Facts
- The bill declares that any contract clause prohibiting the disclosure of child sexual abuse is void and unenforceable as a matter of public policy.
- The law applies to victims, alleged victims, and any other person disclosing facts related to the abuse.
- The bill defines a 'minor person' as anyone under 18 years of age.
- The bill defines 'sexual abuse' to include offenses under chapter 110 of title 18, sex trafficking under section 1591, or any sexual act/contact that is a criminal offense under federal or state law.
- The bill explicitly allows for confidentiality regarding the specific dollar amounts or payment terms of a settlement, provided those terms do not restrict the disclosure of the abuse itself.
- The bill is justified by Congress under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause' and Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to prevent the obstruction of justice and protect constitutional rights.
- The bill asserts that judicial enforcement of such NDAs by state courts constitutes 'State action' that may violate the 14th Amendment.
Why It Matters
If passed, this law would invalidate existing and future contract clauses that currently prevent survivors of child sexual abuse from speaking publicly or reporting their experiences to authorities.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this bill make all settlement agreements illegal?
Who is considered a minor under this law?
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Constitutional Justification
The bill explicitly frames the invalidation of private NDAs as a 14th Amendment issue, arguing that state court enforcement of these contracts constitutes 'State action' that violates due process.
Connected Entities
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz50Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools