POLISCOPE
Back to feed
S3966FEDERALpassed_chamber
Passed

TREY'S Law: Protecting Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse

Original title: TREY'S Law

March 3, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Where This Stands

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Signed

Currently passed_chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Signed.

Last action
Held at the desk.May 20, 2026

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

The Frame

What this does

If passed, this law would invalidate existing and future contract clauses that currently prevent survivors of child sexual abuse from speaking publicly or reporting their experiences to authorities.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Survivors of child sexual abuse

They would gain the legal right to disclose their abuse regardless of any prior nondisclosure agreements they may have signed.

Legal entities and defendants in abuse cases

They would be unable to enforce contract clauses that require silence regarding the underlying facts of child sexual abuse.

What changed

Current stage: passed_chamber.

What's next

Signed.

Summary

TREY'S Law is a proposed federal bill that would make nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) unenforceable if they prevent victims or witnesses from reporting the sexual abuse of a minor. The bill aims to ensure that private contracts cannot be used to silence survivors or obstruct law enforcement investigations.

Key Facts

  • The bill declares that any contract clause prohibiting the disclosure of child sexual abuse is void and unenforceable as a matter of public policy.
  • The law applies to victims, alleged victims, and any other person disclosing facts related to the abuse.
  • The bill defines a 'minor person' as anyone under 18 years of age.
  • The bill defines 'sexual abuse' to include offenses under chapter 110 of title 18, sex trafficking under section 1591, or any sexual act/contact that is a criminal offense under federal or state law.
  • The bill explicitly allows for confidentiality regarding the specific dollar amounts or payment terms of a settlement, provided those terms do not restrict the disclosure of the abuse itself.
  • The bill is justified by Congress under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause' and Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to prevent the obstruction of justice and protect constitutional rights.
  • The bill asserts that judicial enforcement of such NDAs by state courts constitutes 'State action' that may violate the 14th Amendment.

Why It Matters

If passed, this law would invalidate existing and future contract clauses that currently prevent survivors of child sexual abuse from speaking publicly or reporting their experiences to authorities.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill make all settlement agreements illegal?
No. The bill only voids contract clauses that prevent the disclosure of child sexual abuse. Confidentiality regarding settlement payment amounts remains permissible.
Who is considered a minor under this law?
A minor is defined as any individual who has not yet reached 18 years of age.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Constitutional Justification

The bill explicitly frames the invalidation of private NDAs as a 14th Amendment issue, arguing that state court enforcement of these contracts constitutes 'State action' that violates due process.

Connected Entities

personMr. SchmittCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMr. WelchCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMrs. BrittCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →
personMr. CruzLead sponsor of the bill.Map →
organizationCommittee on the JudiciaryThe Senate committee currently reviewing the bill.Map →
personMrs. GillibrandCo-sponsor of the bill.Map →

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record