POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas House Bill 217 Shields Groundwater Districts From Liability Over Well Production Limits

Original title: Relating to the liability of a groundwater conservation district for actions of the district restricting groundwater production from a well.

Last action · July 28, 2025: FiledSponsors: Cody Harris and 18 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Relating to the liability of a groundwater conservation district for actions of the district restricting groundwater production from a well.

Why it matters

Well owners and agricultural or industrial operators lose the legal right to sue s for financial damages caused by restrictions on well water extraction. This shifts the financial risk of reduced water access entirely onto well owners.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Groundwater Conservation Districts

Groundwater conservation districts are granted immunity from financial liability for damages resulting from well production restrictions and regulatory enforcement.

Directly affected

Well Owners

Well owners lose the legal right to seek financial damages from groundwater districts when production from their wells is restricted or denied.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue a groundwater conservation district if it denies my well permit?
No. Under House Bill 217, districts are immune from liability for damages resulting from the issuance, renewal, amendment, denial, or enforcement of a permit.
Does this bill apply to lawsuits filed before the effective date?
No. The immunity applies strictly to a that accrues on or after the effective date of the Act.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jul 28, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Carrie Isaac, Keith Bell, Daniel Alders and 11 more
PersonCarrie Isaac“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonKeith Bell“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonDaniel Alders“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonBrent Money“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJeff Barry“Bill sponsor”Map →
PersonJay Dean“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonSam Harless“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonCody Harris“Primary bill author in the Texas House”Map →
PersonJanie Lopez“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonStan Gerdes“Bill sponsor”Map →
PersonCole Hefner“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonCecil Bell“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonDon McLaughlin“Cosponsor”Map →
otherWater Code“Statutory code being amended”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record