POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Massachusetts Senate bill establishes rules for medical chaperones and prohibits nonconsensual intimate examinations on unconscious patients

Original title: An Act relative to medical chaperones and medical exams

Last action · August 10, 2026: Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Health Care FinancingSponsors: Brendan Crighton and 12 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

The Massachusetts Senate committee on Public Health reported favorably on Senate Bill 3197, combining previous petitions to regulate medical chaperones during certain examinations and ban nonconsensual intimate exams on patients.

Why it matters

Sets new legal standards for patient consent and chaperone presence during sensitive medical examinations across the state, affecting medical providers and patients alike.

Background
  • Senate Bill 3197 was drafted following specific petitions from state senators addressing medical examination standards and patient consent. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

patients

Patients gain legal protections against nonconsensual intimate examinations while unconscious and have specific rules governing medical chaperones during exams.

Directly affected

medical providers

Medical providers must adhere to new statutory requirements regarding patient consent for intimate exams and the utilization of medical chaperones.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main goal of Senate Bill 3197?
The bill addresses the prohibition of nonconsensual on unconscious patients and establishes regulations for medical chaperones during exams.
Which committee reported on the bill?
The Joint Committee on Public Health reported favorably on the bill.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Aug 10, 2026SenateCommittee
    Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Health Care Financing
  2. Aug 10, 2026Senate
    New draft of S1485 and S1491
  3. Aug 10, 2026Senate
    Reported from the committee on Public Health

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Consolidation of Patient Protection Petitions

The committee combined two separate petitions concerning patient consent and medical chaperones into a single consolidated bill, Senate No. 3197.

Connected Entities

Joint Committee on Public Health
OrganizationJoint Committee on Public Health“Committee that reported favorably on the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record