POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts requires gas and distribution companies to disclose winning bids and scoring for private utility construction contracts of $100,000 or more

Original title: An Act relative to transparency in private utility construction contracts

Last action · December 4, 2025: Accompanied a study order, see S2774Sponsors: Mike Moore and 12 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Gas and distribution companies awarding utility construction contracts of $100,000 or more involving public ways must notify all bidding contractors within two business days and publish winning bid details online. The law requires utilities to share award criteria and bidder s, with specific exemptions for single-bid solicitations or when disclosure compromises law enforcement, commercial interests, or competition.

Why it matters

Contracting entities bidding on utility projects gain standardized access to scoring metrics and winning bid amounts, altering transparency requirements for public-way construction agreements.

Background
  • Michael O. Moore filed Senate Bill 2307 as a petition during the 194th session of the Massachusetts General Court. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Gas or distribution companies

Gas and distribution companies must follow new notification timelines, publish winning bid details online, and provide scoring metrics to bidders for qualifying construction contracts.

Directly affected

Responsible bidders

Contractors submitting bids receive mandatory written notice of contract decisions, award criteria, and their own performance scores within two business days.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What information must be posted publicly when a contract is awarded?
The winning bid, the name of the contractor, the winning amount, and the location of the project must be posted on the company's website.
Are there any exceptions where companies do not have to follow these rules?
Yes, if there is only one response to a solicitation, or if disclosing the information would impede law enforcement, go against the public interest, prejudice commercial interests, or interfere with competition.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Dec 4, 2025Senate
    Accompanied a study order, see S2774
  2. May 28, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 06/04/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2
  3. Feb 27, 2025House
    House concurred
  4. Feb 27, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Study Order Connection

The bill was accompanied by a study order (S2774) as part of its legislative progress.

Connected Entities

Pat Jehlen, Mike Brady, Jason Lewis and 8 more
PersonPat Jehlen“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMike Brady“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJason Lewis“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonBrian Murray“Legislator petitioning for the legislation”Map →
PersonSusannah Whipps“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJo Comerford“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMike Moore“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 2307”Map →
PersonErika Uyterhoeven“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonJim Hawkins“Legislator petitioning for the legislation”Map →
PersonAngelo Puppolo“Legislator petitioning for the legislation”Map →
PersonJamie Eldridge“Cosponsor”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record