POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Updating Disability Terminology in D.C. Court Laws

Original title: Words Matter for the District of Columbia Courts Act

Record date · September 27, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill updates outdated and offensive language in the by replacing terms like 'retarded' with 'persons with moderate intellectual disabilities.' These changes apply to the legal definitions used by the U.S. District Court, the Superior Court, and the Family Court in D.C.

Why it matters

This legislation standardizes legal language across D.C. court s to reflect modern terminology, ensuring that court documents and statutes use respectful, person-first language when referring to individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Background
  • The District of Columbia Official Code serves as the primary body of law for the District of Columbia, and amendments to it are often required to ensure consistency with federal standards or modern social norms. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Individuals with intellectual disabilities in D.C.

The legal code governing their interactions with the court system will be updated to use person-first terminology.

Directly affected

District of Columbia Courts

The courts must update their internal references and legal documents to align with the new terminology mandated by the amended code.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill change the actual legal powers of the D.C. courts?
No, the bill is limited to updating terminology used in the D.C. Official Code; it does not alter the or authority of the courts.
Why is this change being made?
The bill aims to replace outdated and potentially offensive language with modern, respectful terminology regarding individuals with intellectual disabilities.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Modernization of Legal Language

The bill reflects a broader legislative trend of removing outdated, stigmatizing language from government codes in favor of person-first terminology.

Connected Entities

District of Columbia, United States District Court, Mr. Casey and 6 more
locationDistrict of Columbia“Subject of the bill's amendments”Map →
OrganizationUnited States District Court“Court jurisdiction impacted by the bill”Map →
PersonMr. Casey“Senator sponsoring the bill”Map →
bill numberS. 3698“Bill number”Map →
PersonMr. Moran“Senator sponsoring the bill”Map →
OrganizationFamily Court“Court jurisdiction impacted by the bill”Map →
Organization118th Congress“Legislative body”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Government Publishing Office“Source of the bill”Map →
OrganizationSuperior Court“Court jurisdiction impacted by the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record