POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofHealth →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Vermont Prohibits AI-Delivered Mental Health Services and Regulates Professional AI Use

Original title: An act relating to regulating the use of artificial intelligence in the provision of mental health services

Last action · January 13, 2026: Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Health and WelfareSponsors: Martine Gulick and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Vermont S.241 prohibits any person, corporation, or entity from offering, providing, or advertising mental health services delivered by in whole or in part, subject to civil penalties under the Consumer Protection Act. The bill restricts licensed and unlicensed mental health professionals from using AI for therapeutic decisions, communications, treatment plans, or emotion interpretation, while permitting AI for specific and transcription tasks under strict consent and confidentiality rules.

Why it matters

Mental health service providers face professional licensing disciplinary action and civil penalties of $10,000 per violation for unauthorized use, while patients gain statutory protections against automated therapy chatbots.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Mental health professionals

Practitioners are prohibited from using artificial intelligence for therapeutic decisions, communications, or treatment planning, and face unprofessional conduct charges for misuse, while being permitted to use AI for specific administrative support and transcription with patient consent.

Directly affected

Mental health service providers and corporations

Entities offering, providing, or advertising AI-delivered mental health services are barred from doing so and face Consumer Protection Act violations and $10,000 civil penalties per violation.

Directly affected

Patients and clients receiving mental health services

Individuals receiving mental health services are guaranteed that their care is delivered by human professionals rather than artificial intelligence, and must give explicit written consent before any AI transcription or recording of their sessions can occur.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can mental health professionals in Vermont use artificial intelligence for any tasks?
Yes, mental health professionals may use AI for tasks—such as scheduling appointments, processing billing claims, and drafting general logistical communications—as well as for transcription and recording, provided they obtain prior written consent from the patient and assume full responsibility for all outputs.
What happens if an entity offers AI-driven therapy or mental health chatbots in Vermont?
Offering, providing, or advertising AI-delivered mental health services is prohibited and constitutes a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, carrying a civil penalty of $10,000.00 per violation.
Are unlicensed mental health providers covered by this legislation?
Yes, the restrictions apply to licensed practitioners as well as nonlicensed or noncertified psychotherapists, psychoanalysts, and any other professionals providing mental health services.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Health and Welfare

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Creation of AI-Specific Professional Misconduct Standards

The bill establishes a novel statutory chapter (26 V.S.A. chapter 120) specifically governing artificial intelligence across regulated healthcare professions.

Connected Entities

Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Center for Countering Digital Hate, Carnegie Mellon University and 7 more
OrganizationStanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence“Evaluated artificial intelligence systems against clinical standards”Map →
OrganizationCenter for Countering Digital Hate“Found patterns of chatbot advice pertaining to mental health and self-harm”Map →
OrganizationCarnegie Mellon University“Evaluated artificial intelligence systems against clinical standards”Map →
PersonVirginia Lyons“Cosponsor of S.241”Map →
OrganizationUniversity of Texas“Evaluated artificial intelligence systems against clinical standards”Map →
PersonRuth Hardy“Cosponsor of S.241”Map →
PersonRebecca White“Cosponsor of S.241”Map →
PersonMartine Gulick“Lead sponsor of S.241”Map →
OrganizationUniversity of Minnesota Twin Cities“Evaluated artificial intelligence systems against clinical standards”Map →
PersonTanya Vyhovsky“Cosponsor of S.241”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.vermont.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record