Congressional Hearing on Quantum Computing
January 1, 2019
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing served as an information-gathering session for federal lawmakers to understand the implications of for future digital commerce, security, and consumer technology policy.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Technology Industry
Companies involved in quantum computing research and development are subject to potential future federal policy and regulatory discussions.
Academic Researchers
University researchers in the field of quantum physics and computing are providing expert testimony to shape legislative understanding.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on May 18, 2018, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The session was part of the 'Disrupter Series' focused on emerging technologies.
- Four expert witnesses provided testimony: Matthew Putman (Nanotronics), Christopher Monroe (IonQ), Diana Franklin (University of Chicago), and Michael Brett (QxBranch).
- The hearing was conducted by the Subcommittee on Digital Commerce and Consumer Protection under the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing served as an information-gathering session for federal lawmakers to understand the implications of for future digital commerce, security, and consumer technology policy.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Early Congressional Interest in Quantum
The hearing demonstrates that Congress began formalizing its interest in quantum computing policy as early as 2018 through the 'Disrupter Series'.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools